Non-alcohol based hand rubs a review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines

The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization. Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: La Fleur, Philip, Jones, Sarah (Author)
Corporate Author: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Rapid Response Service
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Ottawa Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health March 16, 2017, 2017
Edition:Version 1.0
Series:Rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03256nam a2200313 u 4500
001 EB001839367
003 EBX01000000000000001003356
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180702 r ||| eng
100 1 |a La Fleur, Philip 
245 0 0 |a Non-alcohol based hand rubs  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b a review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines  |c Philip la Fleur, Sarah Jones 
250 |a Version 1.0 
260 |a Ottawa  |b Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health  |c March 16, 2017, 2017 
300 |a 1 PDF file (26 pages)  |b illustrations 
653 |a Comparative Effectiveness Research 
653 |a Hand Sanitizers 
653 |a Hand Hygiene 
653 |a Anti-Infective Agents 
700 1 |a Jones, Sarah  |e [author] 
710 2 |a Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health  |b Rapid Response Service 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a Rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470501  |3 Volltext  |n NLM Bookshelf Books  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization. Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, such as religious objections, abuse potential, and flammability. These concerns, combined with a desire to optimize infection control and user acceptability, has led to the development of several non-alcohol based hand rub products. These products use antimicrobial agents such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, iodophors or quaternary ammonium compounds; various combinations and formulations have been developed (e.g., water-based, foams, gels, nanocapsules).  
520 |a Antisepsis that uses running water and an aqueous solution is usually referred to as a "scrub". Scrubs are commonly used by surgical staff for hand antisepsis during pre-surgical preparation, and contain agents, such as chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone iodine. Scrubbing involves wetting the hands and forearms with water, systematically applying the scrub solution using hands or sponges and rinsing under running water. This process typically takes up to six minutes. The term "rub" usually refers to hand antisepsis procedures and products that do not require running water. The most commonly used rub products contain at least 60% alcohol (v/v). Alcohol-based rubs have a well-established role in infection control strategy in healthcare settings for routine hand sanitization, including hospitals, outpatient clinics, laboratory settings, community settings and for hand sanitization in surgical context.  
520 |a The purpose of this report is to review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-alcohol based hand sanitizer (rubs) for reducing infection rates and infection transmission in the healthcare setting for both healthcare workers and non-healthcare personnel. Another objective of this report is to summarize evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of non-alcohol based hand rubs