|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01610nmm a2200241 u 4500 |
001 |
EB001308857 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000893469 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
161223 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781513586878
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Igan, Deniz
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Delegated Portfolio Management, Benchmarking, and the Effects on Financial Markets
|c Deniz Igan, Marcelo Pinheiro
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 39 pages
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Pinheiro, Marcelo
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781513586878.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2015/198/001.2015.issue-198-en.xml
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a We analyze the implications of linking the compensation of fund managers to the return of their portfolio relative to that of a benchmark-a common solution to the agency problem in delegated portfolio management. In the presence of such relativeperformance- based objectives, investors have reduced expected utility but markets are typically more informative and deeper. Furthermore, in a multiple asset/market framework we show that (i) relative performance concerns lead to an increase in the correlation between markets (financial contagion); (ii) benchmark inclusion increases price volatility; (iii) home bias emerges as a rational outcome. When information is costly, information acquisition is hindered and this attenuates the effects on informativeness and depth of the market
|