|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02379nmm a2200553 u 4500 |
001 |
EB000929128 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000000722724 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
150128 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781451854459
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Auernheimer, Leonardo
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Shock Versus Gradualism in Models of Rational Expectations
|b The Case of Trade Liberalization
|c Leonardo Auernheimer, Susan George
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 1997
|
300 |
|
|
|a 20 pages
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wealth
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments, Foreign
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariffs
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Saving
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade liberalization
|
653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
653 |
|
|
|a Open Economy Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign assets
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investments: Commodities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commodities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commercial policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Consumption; Economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Consumption
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics: Consumption
|
653 |
|
|
|a Investment & securities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commercial products
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commodity Markets
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a George, Susan
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781451854459.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/1997/122/001.1997.issue-122-en.xml?cid=2341-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper provides a new argument for “shock” versus “gradualism” in the implementation of trade policies. In the simple context of a small open economy with rational expectations, we consider the comparative welfare effects of eliminating an import tariff either immediately as an unanticipated shock, or gradually over a preannounced length of time. The gradualist policy introduces a distortion in consumption-accumulation decisions and generates welfare costs. And if the gradual change is extended over “too long” a period, these costs may exceed the long-run benefits of liberalization
|