Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects Causal Objections to Platonism

According to platonists, entities such as numbers, sets, propositions and properties are abstract objects. But abstract objects lack causal powers and a location in space and time, so how could we ever come to know of the existence of such impotent and remote objects? In Knowledge, Cause, and Abstra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheyne, C.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2001, 2001
Edition:1st ed. 2001
Series:The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, A Series of Books in Philosophy of Science, Methodology, Epistemology, Logic, History of Science, and Related Fields
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03251nmm a2200349 u 4500
001 EB000721451
003 EBX01000000000000000574533
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401597470 
100 1 |a Cheyne, C. 
245 0 0 |a Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Causal Objections to Platonism  |c by C. Cheyne 
250 |a 1st ed. 2001 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2001, 2001 
300 |a XVIII, 240 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a 1. Platonism and Causality -- 2. Beliefs and Facts -- 3. Beliefs and Causes -- 4. The Case for a Causal Connection -- 5. Is a Causal Connection Necessary for Knowledge? -- 6. Other Theories of Knowledge -- 7. Existence Claims and Causality -- 8. The Burden of Proof -- 9. Platonic Knowledge by Intuition -- 10. Apriorism -- 11. Indispensability and Platonic Knowledge -- 12. Problems with Prolifigate Platonism -- Conclusion -- Appendices -- I. Does Knowledge Require Belief? -- 1.1. The traditional analysis of knowledge -- 1.2. The truth condition -- 1.3. The consistency of belief and knowledge -- 1.4. Radford’s counterexample -- 1.5. Information and knowledge -- II. Can We Choose Our Beliefs? -- II. 1. Belief-voluntarism and epistemic justification -- 11.2. Belief-voluntarism — is it possible? -- 11.3. Direct belief-voluntarism — is it actual? -- 11.4. Belief and acceptance -- 11.5. Choosing beliefs indirectly 
653 |a Metaphysics 
653 |a Philosophy of Law 
653 |a Ontology 
653 |a Knowledge, Theory of 
653 |a Law / Philosophy 
653 |a Science / Philosophy 
653 |a Epistemology 
653 |a Philosophy of Science 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, A Series of Books in Philosophy of Science, Methodology, Epistemology, Logic, History of Science, and Related Fields 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-94-015-9747-0 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9747-0?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 340.1 
520 |a According to platonists, entities such as numbers, sets, propositions and properties are abstract objects. But abstract objects lack causal powers and a location in space and time, so how could we ever come to know of the existence of such impotent and remote objects? In Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects, Colin Cheyne presents the first systematic and detailed account of this epistemological objection to the platonist doctrine that abstract objects exist and can be known. Since mathematics has such a central role in the acquisition of scientific knowledge, he concentrates on mathematical platonism. He also concentrates on our knowledge of what exists, and argues for a causal constraint on such existential knowledge. Finally, he exposes the weaknesses of recent attempts by platonists to account for our supposed platonic knowledge. This book will be of particular interest to researchers and advanced students of epistemology and of the philosophy of mathematics and science. It will also be of interest to all philosophers with a general interest in metaphysics and ontology