|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02126nam a2200361 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002206629 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001343830 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
240503 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780814751732
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0814751733
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780814751749
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780814765029
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0814765025
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0814751741
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a KF384.Z9 L83 2001
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lubet, Steven
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Nothing but the Truth
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Why Trial Lawyers Don't, Can't, and Shouldn't Have to Tell the Whole Truth
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a New York
|b NYU Press
|c 2001, 2001
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 231 pages
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Acknowledgments; introduction Storytelling Lawyers; 1. Biff and Me: Stories That Are Truer Than True; 2. Edgardo Mortara: Forbidden Truths; 3. John Brown: Political Truth and Consequences; 4. Wyatt Earp: Truth and Context; 5. Liberty Valance: Truth or Justice; 6. Atticus Finch: Race, Class, Gender, and Truth; 7. Sheila McGough: The Impossibility of the Whole Truth; Index; About the Author
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a United States / fast
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Truthfulness and falsehood
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a LAW / Trial Practice
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Law / United States
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Critical America Series
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jj.13944155
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 347.7375
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Lubet's Nothing But The Truth presents a novel and engaging analysis of the role of storytelling in trial advocacy. The best lawyers are storytellers, he explains, who take the raw and disjointed observations of witnesses and transform them into coherent and persuasive narratives. Critics of the adversary system, of course, have little patience for storytelling, regarding trial lawyers as flimflam artists who use sly means and cunning rhetoric to befuddle witnesses and bamboozle juries. Why not simply allow the witnesses to speak their minds, without the distorting influence of lawyers' strata
|