|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02190nma a2200361 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002204414 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001341615 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
240502 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789004517882
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789004517899
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Wang, Anqi
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration
|h Elektronische Ressource
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b Brill
|c 2022
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Most-Favored-Nation clause
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a international investment arbitration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public international law / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a procedural treaty standard
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a treaty interpretation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International economic & trade law / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Investment treaties & disputes / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a substantive treaty standard
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b DOAB
|a Directory of Open Access Books
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 10.1163/9789004517899
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/76641/1/9789004517899.pdf
|7 0
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 856 |
4 |
2 |
|u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/121729
|z DOAB: description of the publication
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 380
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 340
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The open access publication of this book has been published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation. In The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration, Dr. Anqi Wang provides suggestions for MFN drafting in future international investment agreements (IIAs), as well as for MFN application by investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) tribunals in case of ambiguity. Dr. Wang conducts a systemic review of MFN clause in history and maps all the relevant ISDS cases. She argues that ISDS tribunals should interpret the MFN clause according to the treaty text on a case-by-case basis, and that tribunals should also consider state consent as the foundation for the jurisdiction of international adjudication, current IIA reform, and essential treaty interpretive principles.
|