Malnutrition in hospitalized adults a systematic review

Literature searches found no studies that met inclusion criteria and assessed effectiveness of measurement tools. The primary reason studies did not meet inclusion criteria is because they lacked an appropriate control group. Moderate SOE from 11 RCTs found that hospital-initiated malnutrition inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Uhl, Stacey
Corporate Authors: United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ECRI Institute-Penn Medicine Evidence-based Practice Center
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality October 2021, 2021
Series:Comparative effectiveness review
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04267nam a2200277 u 4500
001 EB002191791
003 EBX01000000000000001329256
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 240105 r ||| eng
100 1 |a Uhl, Stacey 
245 0 0 |a Malnutrition in hospitalized adults  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b a systematic review  |c prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by ECRI-Penn Medicine Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, Stacey Uhl [and seven others] 
260 |a Rockville, MD  |b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality  |c October 2021, 2021 
300 |a 1 PDF file (various pagings) 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
710 2 |a United States  |b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 
710 2 |a ECRI Institute-Penn Medicine Evidence-based Practice Center 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a Comparative effectiveness review 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574798  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a Literature searches found no studies that met inclusion criteria and assessed effectiveness of measurement tools. The primary reason studies did not meet inclusion criteria is because they lacked an appropriate control group. Moderate SOE from 11 RCTs found that hospital-initiated malnutrition interventions likely reduce mortality compared with usual care among hospitalized patients diagnosed with malnutrition. Low SOE indicated that hospital-initiated malnutrition interventions may also improve quality of life compared to usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence shows an association between malnutrition and increased mortality and prolonged length of hospital stay among hospitalized patients identified as malnourished. However, the strength of this association varied depending on patient population and tool used to identify malnutrition.  
520 |a Clinical outcomes of interest included mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission, quality of life, functional status, activities of daily living, hospital acquired conditions, wound healing, and discharge disposition. When appropriate, we conducted meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize study findings; otherwise, data were narratively synthesized. When available, we used pooled estimates from existing SRs to determine the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes, and assessed the strength of evidence. RESULTS: Six existing SRs (including 43 unique studies) provided evidence on the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes. Low to moderate strength of evidence (SOE) showed an association between malnutrition and increased hospital mortality and prolonged hospital length of stay. This association was observed across patients hospitalized for an acute medical event requiring intensive care unit care, heart failure, and cirrhosis.  
520 |a Evidence indicates malnutrition-focused hospital-initiated interventions likely reduce mortality and may improve quality of life compared to usual care among patients diagnosed with malnutrition. Research is needed to assess the clinical utility of measurement tools for malnutrition 
520 |a OBJECTIVES: To review the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients, evaluate effectiveness of measurement tools for malnutrition on clinical outcomes, and assess effectiveness of hospital-initiated interventions for patients diagnosed with malnutrition. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases (Embase(r), MEDLINE(r), PubMed(r), and the Cochrane Library) from January 1, 2000, to June 3, 2021. We hand-searched reference lists of relevant studies and searched for unpublished studies in ClinicalTrials.gov. REVIEW METHODS: Using predefined criteria and dual review, we selected (1) existing systematic reviews (SRs) to assess the association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes, (2) randomized and non-randomized studies to evaluate the effectiveness of malnutrition tools on clinical outcomes, and (3) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess effectiveness of hospital-initiated treatments for malnutrition.