The Public Policy Exception in the Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards Lessons from and for China

This book systematically examines how the Chinese arbitration law system responds to the application of the public policy exception in the judicial review of international arbitral awards. The discussion is based on a general understanding of the legal concept of public policy in international arbit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhang, Shu
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023, 2023
Edition:1st ed. 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03612nmm a2200361 u 4500
001 EB002181968
003 EBX01000000000000001319455
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 231010 ||| eng
020 |a 9783662676790 
100 1 |a Zhang, Shu 
245 0 0 |a The Public Policy Exception in the Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Lessons from and for China  |c by Shu Zhang 
250 |a 1st ed. 2023 
260 |a Berlin, Heidelberg  |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |c 2023, 2023 
300 |a XIX, 338 p. 9 illus., 8 illus. in color  |b online resource 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Public Policy in International Arbitration Law -- Overview of China’s Practice in Applying Public Policy in Arbitration Law -- Application of Public Policy in China: The Statistical Study -- Substantive Notions, Public Morals and Fundamental Principles in Public Policy -- Procedural Fundamental Principles in Public Policy -- Public Policy in the Form of Public Policy Rules -- Arbitrability and Public Policy -- An Evaluation of the Application of Public Policy in the Chinese Arbitration System -- Conclusion: A Lesson from and for China 
653 |a Dispute resolution (Law) 
653 |a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law 
653 |a Mediation 
653 |a Public International Law 
653 |a International law 
653 |a Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration 
653 |a Arbitration (Administrative law) 
653 |a Conflict of laws 
653 |a Comparative law 
653 |a Private international law 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-3-662-67679-0 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67679-0?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 340.9 
520 |a This book systematically examines how the Chinese arbitration law system responds to the application of the public policy exception in the judicial review of international arbitral awards. The discussion is based on a general understanding of the legal concept of public policy in international arbitration practice and the understanding developed in Chinese arbitration law and judicial practice. In focusing on both international developments and Chinese arbitral and judicial practice, this book provides some lessons from and for China. The book is based on a review of both legislation and cases in China and a comparison with the international trends and consensuses, as well as a systematic assessment of China’s performance in defining and applying public policy in the judicial review of international commercial arbitral awards. Valuable insights are provided on the basis of detailed analysis of the relevant cases. In this context, the author raised and examined a few key questions to be answered by the judicial practice, including: the international/national nature of public policy, the key elements of public policy, and the appropriate boundaries of judicial review. The author also highlighted a few unique legal concepts and approaches adopted in the Chinese context and evaluated its impacts on foreign parties and practitioners dealing with arbitration issues in China. It is proposed that, in the context of China’s recent law reforms, further steps are expected to be taken by the Chinese legal system in order to achieve a more comprehensive view of the public policy exception that is consistent with the globalized trend of a converging understanding of public policy in international arbitration