Jamaica - Early Childhood Development Project Project Performance Assessment Report

Ratings for the Early Childhood Development Project are as follows: Outcome was moderately unsatisfactory, Bank performance was moderately unsatisfactory, and Quality of monitoring and evaluation was modest. This assessment offers the following lessons: (1) Collaboration, strong national ownership o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: World Bank Group
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2022
Series:Independent Evaluation Group Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01879nmm a2200241 u 4500
001 EB002178018
003 EBX01000000000000001315552
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 231006 ||| eng
245 0 0 |a Jamaica - Early Childhood Development Project  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Project Performance Assessment Report 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2022 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Early Childhood Development 
653 |a Monitoring and Evaluation 
710 2 |a World Bank Group 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a Independent Evaluation Group Studies 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/37909 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/37909  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Ratings for the Early Childhood Development Project are as follows: Outcome was moderately unsatisfactory, Bank performance was moderately unsatisfactory, and Quality of monitoring and evaluation was modest. This assessment offers the following lessons: (1) Collaboration, strong national ownership of the NSP, and financial support are requisite conditions but do not ensure performance and outcomes because the World Bank must also provide rigor and candor in its dialogue and advice. (ii) Country teams need to share and archive lessons and implementation knowledge, including Global Practice knowledge, across projects. (iii) The institutional arrangements for cross-sectoral or cross-ministerial action and coordination are less likely to succeed when authority is centered in one of the involved ministers or ministries. (iv) Intersectoral coordination may more likely be sustained with "light mechanisms" and financial resources that empower ministries and national agencies to focus on achieving a convergence of common policies, actions, and results