|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02709nmm a2200349 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002175412 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001313189 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
230911 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789819935130
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Zheng, Xiaoou
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The Complementarity Between the Nagoya Protocol and Human Rights
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
|c by Xiaoou Zheng
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2023
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Singapore
|b Springer Nature Singapore
|c 2023, 2023
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XXII, 171 p. 1 illus
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a The Nagoya Protocol and International Human Rights Law -- The Principle of Mutual Supportiveness in International Law -- Access -- Benefit-sharing -- Compliance -- Multifaceted Challenges Facing IPLCs and Biodiversity Conservation -- The Complementarity Thesis and its Limitations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public International Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Conflict of laws
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Comparative law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human Rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private international law
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Sustainable Development Goals Series
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-981-99-3513-0
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3513-0?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 340.9
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This book studies the questions of how and to what extent the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) can be interpreted and implemented in light of international human rights law, with a sharpened focus on Indigenous Peoples and local communities. The complementarity thesis is built upon the understanding that ABS and human rights should not and cannot be isolated from one another in order to achieve their respective objectives. A mutually supportive approach to these two bodies of international law is articulated throughout the chapters, covering a wide range of international treaties and ‘soft’ instruments, as well as the practices of the United Nations, international treaty bodies, courts, other international organizations and sometimes NGOs. Legal researchers, legislators and policymakers, human rights practitioners and indeed anyone interested in the development of a more coherent and integrated system of international ABS framework will find this book helpful, with its succinct coverage of current ABS and human rights laws and practices, their pragmatic implications and possible ways of integration forward
|