|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04357nmm a2200397 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002174348 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001312125 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
230816 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 978-0-231-55796-2
|
050 |
|
4 |
|a HN25
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Flanagan, Owen J.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Against happiness
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Owen Flanagan, Joseph E. LeDoux, Bobby Bingle, Daniel M. Haybron, Batja Mesquita, Michele Moody-Adams, Songyao Ren, Anna Sun, and Yolonda Y. Wilson
|
260 |
|
|
|a New York
|b Columbia University Press
|c 2023, ©2023
|
300 |
|
|
|a xii, 345 pages
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Intro -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Part I: Happiness Philosophy and Happiness Science -- 1. Introduction: The Happiness Agenda -- 2. Varieties of Theories and Measures of Well-Being and Happiness -- 3. How Should We Think About the Emotion of Happiness Scientifically? Lessons from the Science of Fear -- 4. Why Averaging Happiness Scores and Comparing Them Is a Terrible Idea -- Part II: Culture and Happiness -- 5. Positive and Negative Emotions: Culture, Content, and Context -- 6. Happiness and Well-Being as Cultural Projects: Immigration, Biculturalism, Cultural Belonging -- 7. Happiness and Well-Being in Contemporary China -- Part III: Race, Racism, Resignation -- 8. Happiness, Race, and Hermeneutical Justice: The Case of African American Mental Health -- 9. Interpreting Self-Reports of Well-Being -- Part IV: Conclusions -- 10. Recommendations for Policy Use of Happiness Metrics -- 11. Universal Rights, Sustainable Development, and Happiness: Two out of Three Ain't Bad -- Part V: Responses by Four Critics -- 12. On Ersatz Happiness, by Jennifer A. Frey -- 13. Why the Analysis and Assessment of Happiness Matters, by Hazel Rose Markus -- 14. Three out of Three Is Better, by Jeffrey D. Sachs -- 15. What the Gallup World Poll Could Do to Deepen Our Understanding of Happiness in Different Cultures, by Jeanne L. Tsai -- Notes -- References -- Index.
|
653 |
|
|
|a Glück
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wohlbefinden
|
653 |
|
|
|a Wirtschaftspsychologie
|
653 |
|
|
|a Sozialpsychologie
|
653 |
|
|
|a Well-being
|
653 |
|
|
|a Happiness--Philosophy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economics--Psychological aspects
|
653 |
|
|
|a Social policy--Psychological aspects
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a LeDoux, Joseph E.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bingle, Bobby
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mesquita, Batja
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b GRUYMPG
|a DeGruyter MPG Collection
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.7312/flan20948
|
776 |
|
|
|z 978-0-231-20949-6
|
776 |
|
|
|z 978-0-231-20948-9
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7312/flan20948
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 301
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a "It was hardly a surprise to philosophers or members of every religion in the world when economists announced in the 1970s that happiness was not correlated with rises in personal income or national GDP; their traditions had made this point for millennia. But it did prompt a response: the happiness agenda, a movement that endorses metrics indicating happiness and well-being as a guide to public policy, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network annual World Happiness Report. A surprising and unnerving 2021 Gallup report revealed that Americans are "thriving" at the highest levels ever measured-despite COVID, declining life expectancy, alarming rises in economic insecurity, political polarization, creeping authoritarianism, stress, and loneliness. This collection challenges the report's assumptions, investigating the nature of happiness and well-being in cross-cultural, multiracial contexts. It examines terminology, theoretical approaches, and measurement criteria; interpretations of self-reports; the sciences of emotion; the importance of culture; and racial and hermeneutic injustice, concluding that there are vast inter- and intracultural differences in ideas and theories about happiness but that all are socially based, culturally specific and normative-ethics-based-in contrast to standard indices and measurements, which are empirical snapshots of economic conditions. If subjective measures of well-being are to guide policy, they must presume a deep connection to social justice, and they work best if the causes of unhappiness and ill-being are identified and solutions to eliminate them are prioritized"
|