|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
04993nmm a2200433 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002167916 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001305248 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
230704 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783031265266
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Wang, Xi
|e [editor]
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c edited by Xi Wang, Xiaobo Zhao, Noeleen McNamara
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2023
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Cham
|b Springer International Publishing
|c 2023, 2023
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XV, 404 p. 8 illus., 7 illus. in color
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Part I EPIL in China: Historical Development and Theoretical Foundations -- Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China - An Overview -- Historical Development of Environmental Public Interest Litigation (EPIL) in China -- Defining Public Interest under the Environmental Public Interest Litigation System -- From Compensation to Prevention: Expanding the Function of EPIL in China -- The Standing to Sue of NGOs in Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China: A Doctrinal Analysis of Laws and Cases -- Environmental Public Interest Litigation and the Application of Civil Code -- Part II Substantive and Procedural Issues about EPIL In China -- Procuratorates at the Crossroad: Performance, Controversies and Prospects of Procuratorial EPIL in China -- Litigation for Ecological and Environmental Damage Compensation in China: EPIL with Typical Chinese Characteristics -- The Role of NGOs in China’s Environmental Public Interest Litigation -- Regulating through Litigation: Regulatory Functions ofNGO-Led Civil Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China -- From Advocators to Rule Makers: Exploring the Role of Chinese Lawyers in Environmental Law Making and Public Interest Litigation -- Three-dimensional Model of Expertise-input for EPIL in China -- Judicial Application of Ecological Remediation Liability in EPIL: A Commentary to the Guiding Cases, Gazettes Cases and Model Cases of the SPC in China -- Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards: Environmental Public Interest Litigation in Soil Pollution Law -- Part III Reform the EPIL System in China: Problems and Solutions -- The Erroneous Setting of the Essential Attribute of Environmental Public Interest Liability in China -- From the Ternary Model to the Binary Model - On the Reconstruction of Litigation Systems for Environmental Public Interest -- Drawbacks in the System Design of the Environmental Public Interest Litigation and Ways for Improvement
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Environmental Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental Management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental law, International
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Conflict of laws
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Comparative law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human Rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Environmental policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private international law
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhao, Xiaobo
|e [editor]
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a McNamara, Noeleen
|e [editor]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-3-031-26526-6
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26526-6?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 344.046
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This book offers readers an accessible and broad-ranging guide to Environmental Public Interest Litigation (EPIL), which has burgeoned in China over the past decade. The aim of this book is to provide a systematic review of Chinese experiences with EPIL in environmental matters, both with a view to gauging its success to date and well as discussing some more critical aspects. To this end, the book systematically examines the establishment and development of EPIL in China's legal, social, and political contexts. It examines particularly the significant role and functions of EPIL in China's environmental governance, and the far-reaching impacts on Chinese civil society and governments. It also offers readers an insiders' perspective in terms of procedural and substantive issues with respect to EPIL, by reviewing the institutional designs, theoretical underpinnings and specific mechanisms, the roles of various participants and stakeholders involved in this legal process. At the same time,it studies leading EPIL cases raised from environmental pollution, natural resource damage and ecological damage, and the effectiveness of environmental adjudication that sustains EPIL as a new form of judicial instrument. This book is written to remedy the gap between Chinese and English literature in this area of law. The analysis of these issues, through a historic and comparative perspective, reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the current legal regime and serves as a basis for recommendations for bringing about more effective EPIL in China
|