|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
05051nma a2201609 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002158419 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001296534 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
230515 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783036564562
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a books978-3-0365-6457-9
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783036564579
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Scheibel, Markus
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Shoulder Arthroplasty: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
|h Elektronische Ressource
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Basel
|b MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
|c 2023
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 electronic resource (242 p.)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a range of motion
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a systematic review
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a modular reverse prosthesis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a projections
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Lazarus score
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a periprosthetic shoulder infection
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a length of stay
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a prosthesis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a design
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a pandemic
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a larger glenosphere
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a results
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a clinical scores
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a hemiarthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reverse arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a shoulder arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a meta-analysis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a healing
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a glenoid retroversion
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a double shadow
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a shoulder dislocation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a scapular notching
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a head split
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a mortality
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a VBHC
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a glenohumeral osteoarthritis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cuff tear arthropathy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a midterm results
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a acromion morphology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a older patients
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a proximal humerus fracture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sirveaux score
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a PROMs
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a shoulder instability
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a clinical outcome
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a energy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a lateralization
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a LSA
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a radiologic outcome
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a augment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a anatomic arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a arthroscopy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a same-day discharge
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a splitting
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a COVID
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a patient value
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a survivorship
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a onlay
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a integration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a TXA
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a failed hemiarthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a posteroinferior approach
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a rotator cuff-sparing
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a complication
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a n/a
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a coronavirus
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a wear
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a high
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a polyethylene
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a shoulder hemiprosthesis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a dislocation arthropathy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a patient reported outcome measures
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Medicine / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a total shoulder arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a inlay
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a costs
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a radiographic analysis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a tranexamic acid
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a hemi arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a loosening
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a shoulder
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a avascular necrosis of the humeral head
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a revision
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a bleeding
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reverse shoulder arthroplasty
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reverse total shoulder replacement
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a pelican sign
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a quality
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a autologous graft
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a anatomic total shoulder replacement
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a trauma
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a osteoarthritis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a anatomical study
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a degeneration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a conversion
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a low
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a metal back glenoid
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a union
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a tuberosity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reimplantation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a glenohumeral osteoarthrosis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a young patients
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a computed tomography
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a two-stage exchange
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a value-based health care
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a defect
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a distalization
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a reconstruction
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a DSA
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a humerus
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a stemless
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lädermann, Alexandre
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Audigé, Laurent
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Scheibel, Markus
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b DOAB
|a Directory of Open Access Books
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 10.3390/books978-3-0365-6457-9
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfview/book/6800
|7 0
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 856 |
4 |
2 |
|u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/98773
|z DOAB: description of the publication
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 414
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 800
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 610
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 333
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 580
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 700
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a This reprint focused on the advancements in the field of shoulder arthroplasty in recent years. These concern surgical indications that have dramatically evolved and planification and navigation. The rapid development of surgical techniques and new prosthetic designs, as well as glenoid and humeral reconstruction for various conditions, is also overviewed. Despite the important progress highlighted in this reprint, there is currently a myriad of prosthetic designs, highlighting the evolving nature of this field.
|