|
|
|
|
LEADER |
06607nma a2201177 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002143148 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001281274 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
230202 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781928424345
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9781928424352
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Marais, Lochner
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Space and planning in secondary cities
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Reflections from South Africa
|
260 |
|
|
|a Bloemfontein
|b UJ Press
|c 2019
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 electronic resource (314 p.)
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial change
|
653 |
|
|
|a 1990-2013
|
653 |
|
|
|a Municipal infrastructure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Water and sanitation infrastructure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Drakenstein Municipality's spatial problems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Socioecological systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a complexity theory and spatial change
|
653 |
|
|
|a Integrated development
|
653 |
|
|
|a realistic plans in a situation of economic stagnation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial planning and complexity lessons
|
653 |
|
|
|a Internal dynamics that hinder spatial transformation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Policy for spatial containment
|
653 |
|
|
|a Quality of the spatial development framework and planning process
|
653 |
|
|
|a Post-apartheid spatial policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Adaptive co-evolution
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demographics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Balancing urban and rural land development
|
653 |
|
|
|a Settlement planning and housing policy for mining towns
|
653 |
|
|
|a Complexity as a lens to assess spatial planning instruments
|
653 |
|
|
|a Urban sprawl
|
653 |
|
|
|a The 2013 spatial development framework
|
653 |
|
|
|a Complexity in spatial planning for Stellenbosch Municipality
|
653 |
|
|
|a Gated estates
|
653 |
|
|
|a Planning in a difficult space
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial planning in Matjhabeng: 1994-2018
|
653 |
|
|
|a Precinct plans
|
653 |
|
|
|a The 2005/2006 spatial development framework
|
653 |
|
|
|a Resource custodianship
|
653 |
|
|
|a spatial transformation
|
653 |
|
|
|a spatial planning
|
653 |
|
|
|a Context and changes in Matjhabeng
|
653 |
|
|
|a the contribution of the spatial development framework to spatial transformation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Optimal land use
|
653 |
|
|
|a Participatory planning
|
653 |
|
|
|a N4 Maputo corridor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Matjhabeng: planning in the face of the Free State Goldfields decline
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial transformation and complexity
|
653 |
|
|
|a Implications for planning in complex systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a Mining booms and busts
|
653 |
|
|
|a Collaborative and adaptive planning and leadership
|
653 |
|
|
|a complex spaces
|
653 |
|
|
|a Settlement hierarchy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Main spatial challenges
|
653 |
|
|
|a Mbombela: a growing provincial capital and tourism destination
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial priorities and plans
|
653 |
|
|
|a thema EDItEUR::A The Arts::AM Architecture::AMV Landscape architecture and design::AMVD City and town planning: architectural aspects
|
653 |
|
|
|a Factors affecting spatial change in Polokwane Local Municipality
|
653 |
|
|
|a External dynamics that hinder spatial transformation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Msunduzi: spatially integrating Kwazulu-Natal's diverse capital
|
653 |
|
|
|a Interconnected nodes and car-free transport
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial changes in Matjhabeng
|
653 |
|
|
|a Policy and planning frameworks
|
653 |
|
|
|a Secondary cities and research and policy in South Africa
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial planning problems in Rustenburg
|
653 |
|
|
|a and preservation of heritage
|
653 |
|
|
|a Secondary cities
|
653 |
|
|
|a Complexity of planning in Mahikeng
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial and population change
|
653 |
|
|
|a Planning for spatial transformation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Welkom's economy and global market forces
|
653 |
|
|
|a Infrastructure
|
653 |
|
|
|a Corridors and transportation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Complex adaptive systems
|
653 |
|
|
|a The 2015 Matjhabeng by-laws
|
653 |
|
|
|a sprawl
|
653 |
|
|
|a Spatial planning for the Limpopo energy hub
|
653 |
|
|
|a Promotion of agriculture and food production
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Nel, Verna
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Marais, Lochner
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Nel, Verna
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b DOAB
|a Directory of Open Access Books
|
500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.18820/9781928424352
|
856 |
4 |
2 |
|u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/96034
|z DOAB: description of the publication
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/60649/1/9781928424352.pdf
|7 0
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 720
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 630
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 576
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 333
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 380
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 700
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 340
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a Much of the urban research focuses on the large metropolitan areas in South Africa. This book assesses spatial planning in the second-tier cities of the country. Secondary cities are vital as they perform essential regional, and in some cases, global economic roles and help to distribute the population of a country more evenly across its surface. Apartheid planning left South African cities fragmented segregated and with low densities. Post-apartheid policies aim to reverse these realities by emphasising integration, higher densities and upgrading. Achieving these aims has been challenging and often the historical patterns continue. The evidence shows that two opposing patterns prevail, namely increased densities and continued urban sprawl. This book presents ten case studies of spatial planning and spatial transformation in secondary cities of South Africa. The book frames these case studies against complexity theory and suggests that the post-apartheid response to apartheid planning represents a linear deviation from history. The ten case studies then reveal how difficult it is for local decision-makers to find appropriate responses and how current responses often result in contradictory results. Often these cities are highly vulnerable and they find it difficult to plan in the context of uncertainty. The book also highlights how these cities find it difficult to stand on their own against the influence of interest groups (property developers, mining companies, traditional authorities, other spheres of government). The main reasons include weak municipal finance statements, the dependence on national and provincial government for capital expenditure, limited investment in infrastructure maintenance, the lack of planning capacity, the inability to implement plans and the unintended and sometimes contrary outcomes of post-apartheid planning policies.
|