|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02547nmm a2200325 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002142161 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001280287 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
230201 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9783031193057
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Jones, Emma R.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c by Emma R. Jones
|
250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2023
|
260 |
|
|
|a Cham
|b Palgrave Macmillan
|c 2023, 2023
|
300 |
|
|
|a XI, 166 p
|b online resource
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a 1. Introduction: Being and Sexuate Difference -- 2. Relation and RefusaL: Irigaray and Lacan -- 3. Hearing Silence, Speaking Language: Irigaray and Heidegger -- 4. The Enunciation of Place: Dialogues -- 5. Speaking at the Limit: Ethics, Ontology, Language -- 6. Love and (Re) Birth at the Limit
|
653 |
|
|
|a Feminism
|
653 |
|
|
|a Social sciences / Philosophy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Continental Philosophy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Feminism and Feminist Theory
|
653 |
|
|
|a Psychoanalysis
|
653 |
|
|
|a Feminist theory
|
653 |
|
|
|a Social Philosophy
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-3-031-19305-7
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19305-7?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 305.4201
|
520 |
|
|
|a Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically naïve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis. By tracing the notion of relation throughout Irigaray’s work, this book identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray’s thought (despite some critics’ concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that always already implies an ethical project. The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings. This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, feminism, and psychotherapy
|