Harmful Tax Practices - 2021 Peer Review Reports on the Exchange of Information on Tax Rulings Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5

Under the BEPS Action 5 minimum standard, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) have committed to counter harmful tax practices with a focus on improving transparency. One part of the Action 5 minimum standard is the transparency framework for compuls...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Paris OECD Publishing 2022
Series:OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: OECD Books and Papers - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03890nmm a2200289 u 4500
001 EB002138607
003 EBX01000000000000001276734
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 230104 ||| eng
020 |a 9789264554276 
020 |a 9789264622074 
020 |a 9789264404472 
245 0 0 |a Harmful Tax Practices - 2021 Peer Review Reports on the Exchange of Information on Tax Rulings  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5  |c Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 
246 2 1 |a Pratiques fiscales dommageables - Rapports d'examen par les pairs relatifs à l'échange de renseignements sur les décisions fiscales de 2021 (version abrégée) : Cadre Inclusif sur le BEPS : Action 5 
260 |a Paris  |b OECD Publishing  |c 2022 
300 |a 460 p.  |c 21 x 28cm 
505 0 |a Austria -- Democratic Republic of the Congo -- Gabon -- Sint Maarten -- Benin -- Spain -- Qatar -- Introduction -- Hungary -- Namibia -- Costa Rica -- Cabo Verde -- Belgium -- Saint Kitts and Nevis -- Ukraine -- Korea -- Kazakhstan -- Albania -- Eswatini -- Bosnia and Herzegovina -- Curaçao -- Australia -- Switzerland -- Grenada -- Germany -- Mexico -- Slovak Republic -- Sri Lanka -- San Marino -- Colombia -- New Zealand -- Abbreviations and acronyms -- Romania -- Burkina Faso -- Georgia -- Armenia -- Morocco -- Poland -- Norway -- Denmark -- France -- Hong Kong (China) -- Czech Republic -- Foreword -- Singapore -- Slovenia -- Antigua and Barbuda -- Viet Nam -- Brunei Darussalam -- Netherlands -- United Kingdom -- Gibraltar -- Samoa -- India -- Israel -- Nigeria -- Thailand -- Malaysia -- Isle of Man -- Croatia -- Liechtenstein -- Ireland -- Guernsey -- Uruguay -- Kenya -- Malta -- Portugal -- Senegal -- South Africa -- China (People's Republic of) -- Estonia -- Dominican Republic -- Botswana -- Brazil -- Barbados -- Faroe Islands -- Peru -- Lithuania -- Jamaica -- Jersey -- Pakistan -- Chile -- United States -- Saint Lucia -- Executive summary -- Canada -- Mauritius -- Finland -- Latvia -- Indonesia -- Greece -- Japan -- Italy -- Congo -- Iceland -- Angola -- Türkiye -- Andorra -- Philippines -- Sweden -- Aruba -- Liberia -- Seychelles -- Jordan -- Egypt -- Argentina -- Luxembourg 
653 |a Taxation 
710 2 |a Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OECD  |a OECD Books and Papers 
490 0 |a OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project 
024 8 |a /10.1787/4034ce42-en 
856 4 0 |a oecd-ilibrary.org  |u https://doi.org/10.1787/4034ce42-en  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 336 
520 |a Under the BEPS Action 5 minimum standard, members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) have committed to counter harmful tax practices with a focus on improving transparency. One part of the Action 5 minimum standard is the transparency framework for compulsory spontaneous exchange of information on certain tax rulings. The exchange on tax rulings is a critical tool in improving access of tax administrations to information relevant to assess the corporate tax affairs of their taxpayers and to efficiently tackle tax avoidance and other BEPS risks. Over 135 countries and jurisdictions participate in the Inclusive Framework on BEPS and take part in the peer review process to assess their compliance with the transparency framework. Specific terms of reference and a methodology have been agreed for the peer reviews, focusing the assessment on five key elements: information gathering process, exchange of information, confidentiality of the information received, statistics on the exchanges on rulings, and transparency on certain aspects of intellectual property regimes. This report reflects the outcome of the sixth annual peer review of the implementation of the Action 5 minimum standard