Premium versus standard intraocular lenses for cataracts a review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

Because of the potential benefits that premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) may offer, alongside the potential for increased expense on the part of the patient and/or third-party payers, evidence is needed to inform decision-making. This report aims to synthesize available evidence on the comparative c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khangura, Sara, Adcock, Lorna (Author), Campbell, Kaitryn (Author)
Corporate Author: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Rapid Response Service
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Ottawa] Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health 2018, June 18, 2018
Edition:Version: 1.0
Series:CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01557nam a2200277 u 4500
001 EB002136261
003 EBX01000000000000001274388
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221206 r ||| eng
100 1 |a Khangura, Sara 
245 0 0 |a Premium versus standard intraocular lenses for cataracts  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b a review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness  |c authors, Sara D. Khangura, Lorna Adcock, Kaitryn Campbell 
250 |a Version: 1.0 
260 |a [Ottawa]  |b Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health  |c 2018, June 18, 2018 
300 |a 1 PDF file (42 pages)  |b illustration 
700 1 |a Adcock, Lorna  |e [author] 
700 1 |a Campbell, Kaitryn  |e [author] 
710 2 |a Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health  |b Rapid Response Service 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581858  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 580 
082 0 |a 610 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Because of the potential benefits that premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) may offer, alongside the potential for increased expense on the part of the patient and/or third-party payers, evidence is needed to inform decision-making. This report aims to synthesize available evidence on the comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of premium compared with standard monofocal IOLs for patients with cataracts