|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02380nam a2200457 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002132698 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001270755 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
221110 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0801456762
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0801449669
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0801449669
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780801461255
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780801461255
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780801449666
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780801449666
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0801461251
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0801461251
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780801456763
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a JF1001
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Hyde, Susan D.
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a The pseudo-democrat's dilemma
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b why election observation became an international norm
|c Susan D. Hyde
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Ithaca
|b Cornell University Press
|c 2011, 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xiii, 245 pages
|b illustrations
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references and index
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Signaling democracy and the norm of internationally observed elections -- Sovereign leaders and the decision to invite observers -- Democracy-contingent benefits -- Does election monitoring matter? -- The quality of monitoring and strategic manipulation -- Conclusion : constrained leaders and changing international expectations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Elections
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International relations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Elections / Corrupt practices
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Democratization
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Election monitoring
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 10.7591/9780801460777
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0801460778
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780801460777
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7z647
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 324.6/5
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Why did election monitoring become an international norm? Why do "pseudo-democrats" (undemocratic leaders who present themselves as democratic) invite international observers, even when they are likely to be caught manipulating elections? Is election observation an effective tool of democracy promotion, or is it simply a way to legitimize electoral autocracies? This book uses cross-national data on election observations since 1960 and case studies of Armenia, Indonesia, Haiti, Peru, Togo, and Zimbabwe to explain international election monitoring with a new theory of international norms
|