How Does Participation in Value Chains Matter to African Farmers?

Trade and participation in global value chains can play a key role in economic diversification and development. This paper deepens the discussion about productivity growth and upgrading in agriculture in Africa, and the role of national, regional, and international value chains in supporting such st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dihel, Nora
Other Authors: Slany, Anja, Goswami, Arti Grover, Hollweg, Claire H.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2018
Series:World Bank E-Library Archive
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02506nmm a2200253 u 4500
001 EB002109029
003 EBX01000000000000001249119
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Dihel, Nora 
245 0 0 |a How Does Participation in Value Chains Matter to African Farmers?  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Dihel, Nora 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2018 
300 |a 60 pages 
700 1 |a Slany, Anja 
700 1 |a Goswami, Arti Grover 
700 1 |a Hollweg, Claire H. 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-8506 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-8506  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Trade and participation in global value chains can play a key role in economic diversification and development. This paper deepens the discussion about productivity growth and upgrading in agriculture in Africa, and the role of national, regional, and international value chains in supporting such structural change. The analysis in this report is based on quantitative and qualitative surveys undertaken in 2016 in Ghana, Kenya, and Zambia, where 3,935 farmers, 60 aggregators, and 56 buyers in the maize, cassava, and sorghum value chains were interviewed in the three countries. The descriptive results show that farmers who were on a contract saw greater structural transformation; higher output; and better access to seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, technology, and extension services compared with farmers who were not on a contract. To identify more robustly the link between value chain participation and contract farming with productivity and upgrading, the paper looks at the relationship using a variety of empirical methodologies, ranging from ordinary least squares and probit regressions to propensity score matching. Based on the empirical evidence, the hypothesis that value chain participation leads to structural transformation cannot be confirmed. The paper does find evidence that formal or informal contractual arrangements that regulate the provision of inputs to production, such as fertilizer, technology, extension services, and market information, positively affect upgrading. It remains nevertheless important to understand the impact of government policies on the emergence of value chains given that value chains support contractual arrangements