Biased Policy Professionals

A large literature focuses on the biases of individuals and consumers, as well as "nudges" and other policies that can address those biases. Although policy decisions are often more consequential than those of individual consumers, there is a dearth of studies on the biases of policy profe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Banuri, Sheheryar
Other Authors: Dercon, Stefan, Gauri, Varun
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2017
Series:World Bank E-Library Archive
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01994nmm a2200253 u 4500
001 EB002104685
003 EBX01000000000000001244775
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Banuri, Sheheryar 
245 0 0 |a Biased Policy Professionals  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Sheheryar Banuri 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2017 
300 |a 31 p 
700 1 |a Banuri, Sheheryar 
700 1 |a Dercon, Stefan 
700 1 |a Gauri, Varun 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
490 0 |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-8113 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-8113  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a A large literature focuses on the biases of individuals and consumers, as well as "nudges" and other policies that can address those biases. Although policy decisions are often more consequential than those of individual consumers, there is a dearth of studies on the biases of policy professionals: those who prepare and implement policy on behalf of elected politicians. Experiments conducted on a novel subject pool of development policy professionals (public servants of the World Bank and the Department for International Development in the United Kingdom) show that policy professionals are indeed subject to decision making traps, including sunk cost bias, the framing of losses and gains, frame-dependent risk-aversion, and, most strikingly, confirmation bias correlated with ideological priors, despite having an explicit mission to promote evidence-informed and impartial decision making. These findings should worry policy professionals and their principals in governments and large organizations, as well as citizens themselves. A further experiment, in which policy professionals engage in discussion, shows that deliberation may be able to mitigate the effects of some of these biases