Voter Response to Natural Disaster Aid Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Drought Relief Payments in Mexico

The paper estimates the effects on presidential election returns in Mexico of a government climatic contingency transfer that is allocated through rainfall-indexed insurance. The analysis uses the discontinuity in payments that slightly deviate from a pre-established threshold, based on rainfall acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fuchs, Alan
Other Authors: Rodriguez-Chamussy, Lourdes
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2014
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01699nmm a2200229 u 4500
001 EB002101242
003 EBX01000000000000001241332
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Fuchs, Alan 
245 0 0 |a Voter Response to Natural Disaster Aid  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Drought Relief Payments in Mexico  |c Fuchs, Alan 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2014 
300 |a 31 p 
700 1 |a Fuchs, Alan 
700 1 |a Rodriguez-Chamussy, Lourdes 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-6836 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-6836  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a The paper estimates the effects on presidential election returns in Mexico of a government climatic contingency transfer that is allocated through rainfall-indexed insurance. The analysis uses the discontinuity in payments that slightly deviate from a pre-established threshold, based on rainfall accumulation measured at local weather stations. It turns out that voters reward the incumbent presidential party for delivering drought relief compensation. The paper finds that receiving indemnity payments leads to significantly greater average electoral support for the incumbent party of approximately 7.6 percentage points. The analysis suggests that the incumbent party is rewarded by disaster aid recipients and punished by non-recipients. The paper contributes to the literature on retrospective voting by providing evidence that voters evaluate government actions and respond to disaster spending