On the Fungibility of Spending and Earnings Evidence from Rural China and Tanzania

A common behavioral assumption of micro-economic theory is that income is fungible. Using household panel data from rural China and Tanzania, this study finds however that people are more likely to spend unearned income on less basic consumption goods such as alcohol and tobacco, non-staple food, tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christiaensen, Luc
Other Authors: Pan, Lei
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2012
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01806nmm a2200229 u 4500
001 EB002100707
003 EBX01000000000000001240797
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Christiaensen, Luc 
245 0 0 |a On the Fungibility of Spending and Earnings  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Evidence from Rural China and Tanzania  |c Luc Christiaensen 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2012 
300 |a 51 p 
700 1 |a Pan, Lei 
700 1 |a Christiaensen, Luc 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-6298 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-6298  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a A common behavioral assumption of micro-economic theory is that income is fungible. Using household panel data from rural China and Tanzania, this study finds however that people are more likely to spend unearned income on less basic consumption goods such as alcohol and tobacco, non-staple food, transportation and communication, and clothing, while they are somewhat more likely to spend earned income on basic consumption goods such as staple food, and invest it in education. This resonates with the widespread cultural notion that money that is easily earned is also more easily spent. Cognitively, the results could be understood within the context of emotional accounting, whereby people classify income based on the emotions it evokes, prompting them to spend hard earned money more wisely to mitigate the negative connotations associated with its acquisition. The policy implications are real, bearing for example on the choice between employment guarantee schemes and cash transfers in designing social security programs