How and why does history matter for development policy ?

The consensus among scholars and policymakers that "institutions matter" for development has led inexorably to a conclusion that "history matters," since institutions clearly form and evolve over time. Unfortunately, however, the next logical step has not yet been taken, which is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woolcock, Michael
Other Authors: Szreter, Simon, Rao, Vijayendra
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2010
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01910nmm a2200241 u 4500
001 EB002099843
003 EBX01000000000000001239933
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Woolcock, Michael 
245 0 0 |a How and why does history matter for development policy ?  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Woolcock, Michael 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2010 
300 |a 30 p 
700 1 |a Woolcock, Michael 
700 1 |a Szreter, Simon 
700 1 |a Rao, Vijayendra 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5425 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-5425  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a The consensus among scholars and policymakers that "institutions matter" for development has led inexorably to a conclusion that "history matters," since institutions clearly form and evolve over time. Unfortunately, however, the next logical step has not yet been taken, which is to recognize that historians (and not only economic historians) might also have useful and distinctive insights to offer. This paper endeavors to open and sustain a constructive dialogue between history - understood as both "the past" and "the discipline" - and development policy by (a) clarifying what the craft of historical scholarship entails, especially as it pertains to understanding causal mechanisms, contexts, and complex processes of institutional change; (b) providing examples of historical research that support, qualify, or challenge the most influential research (by economists and economic historians) in contemporary development policy; and (c) offering some general principles and specific implications that historians, on the basis of the distinctive content and method of their research, bring to development policy debates