Climate Cost Uncertainty, Retrofit Cost Uncertainty, and Infrastructure Closedown A Framework for Analysis

Large and energy-intensive infrastructure investments with long life times have substantial implications for climate policy. This study focuses on options to scale down energy consumption and carbon emissions now and in the future, and on the costs of doing so. Two ways carbon emissions can be reduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miller, Sebastian
Other Authors: Strand, Jon
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C The World Bank 2010
Online Access:
Collection: World Bank E-Library Archive - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02108nmm a2200229 u 4500
001 EB002099626
003 EBX01000000000000001239716
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 221013 ||| eng
100 1 |a Miller, Sebastian 
245 0 0 |a Climate Cost Uncertainty, Retrofit Cost Uncertainty, and Infrastructure Closedown  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b A Framework for Analysis  |c Miller, Sebastian 
260 |a Washington, D.C  |b The World Bank  |c 2010 
300 |a 32 p 
700 1 |a Strand, Jon 
700 1 |a Miller, Sebastian 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b WOBA  |a World Bank E-Library Archive 
028 5 0 |a 10.1596/1813-9450-5208 
856 4 0 |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-5208  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a Large and energy-intensive infrastructure investments with long life times have substantial implications for climate policy. This study focuses on options to scale down energy consumption and carbon emissions now and in the future, and on the costs of doing so. Two ways carbon emissions can be reduced post-investment include retrofitting the infrastructure, or closing it down. Generally, the presence of bulky infrastructure investments makes it more costly to reduce emissions later. Moreover, when expected energy and environmental costs are continually rising, inherent biases in the selection processes for infrastructure investments lead to excessive energy intensity in such investments. Thus great care must be taken when choosing the energy intensity of the infrastructure at the time of investment. Simulations indicate that optimally exercising the retrofit option, when it is available, reduces ex ante expected energy consumption relative to the no-option case. Total energy plus retrofit costs can also be substantially reduced, the more so the larger is ex ante cost uncertainty. However, the availability of the retrofit option also leads to a more energy intensive initial infrastructure choice; this offsets some, but usually not all, of the gains from options for subsequent retrofitting