|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
03260nmm a2200565 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002096008 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001236098 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
221013 ||| eng |
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Mattoo, Aaditya
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Reciprocity across Modes of Supply in the World Trade Organization
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b A Negotiating Formula
|c Mattoo, Aaditya
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C
|b The World Bank
|c 1999
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 24 p.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Comparative Advantage
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a World Trade Organization
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Tariff Reduction
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics and Economic Growth
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Market Access
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Economics & Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a International Trade and Trade Rules
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Reciprocity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade Effect
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Reciprocal Reduction
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Free Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Concessions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade Negotiations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Agreement On Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Emerging Markets
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Sector Development
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Trade and Services
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Welfare Gains
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Volume Of Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Private Sector Development
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Labor
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Terms Of Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Border Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Economic Theory and Research
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a World Trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Terms Of Trade Effects
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Markets
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Mattoo, Aaditya
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Olarreaga, Marcelo
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b WOBA
|a World Bank E-Library Archive
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-2373
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a June 2000 - If negotiations on trade in services at the World Trade Organization are to advance liberalization beyond levels undertaken unilaterally and lead to more balanced outcomes, reciprocity must play a greater role in negotiations. This may be facilitated by the use of negotiating rules that establish credible links across sectors and modes of delivery. Negotiations on trade in services at the World Trade Organization (WTO) have so far produced little liberalization beyond levels countries have undertaken unilaterally. One reason: limited application of the traditional negotiating principle of reciprocity. In particular, participants have failed to exploit the scope of the services agreement (GATS) for the exchange of market-access concessions across different modes of supply - cross-border delivery and the movement of capital and workers. Using the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework, Mattoo and Olarreaga propose a negotiating formula that generalizes the fundamental WTO principle of reciprocity to include alternative modes of delivery. Adoption of this formula as a basis for negotiations could bring greater commitments to liberalization on all modes of delivery, producing substantial gains in global welfare and more balanced outcomes. This paper - a product of Trade, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to improve trade policy in goods and services. The authors may be contacted at amattoo@worldbank.org or molarreaga@worldbank.org
|