International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal Reports, Volume II, 2000-2002

This paper discusses that during 2000–2002, the Tribunal considered a number of issues of substantive law upon which it had not previously been called upon to rule. These included interpretation of a provision of the IMF’s Staff Retirement Plan that permits the IMF, pursuant to specified procedures,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: International Monetary Fund
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, D.C. International Monetary Fund 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: International Monetary Fund - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03110nmm a2200625 u 4500
001 EB002082862
003 EBX01000000000000001222952
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220928 ||| eng
020 |a 9781589067998 
245 0 0 |a International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal Reports, Volume II, 2000-2002 
260 |a Washington, D.C.  |b International Monetary Fund  |c 2009 
300 |a 336 pages 
651 4 |a United States 
653 |a Revenue administration 
653 |a Private Pensions 
653 |a Finance 
653 |a Labour; income economics 
653 |a Collective Bargaining 
653 |a Retirement Policies 
653 |a Employment; Economic theory 
653 |a Human capital 
653 |a Public finance & taxation 
653 |a Industries: Financial Services 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits 
653 |a Aggregate Labor Productivity 
653 |a Unemployment 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Aggregate Human Capital 
653 |a Labor 
653 |a Labor Productivity 
653 |a Retirement 
653 |a International institutions 
653 |a Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General 
653 |a Employee fringe benefits 
653 |a International Economics 
653 |a Pensions 
653 |a Macroeconomics 
653 |a Occupational Choice 
653 |a Wages 
653 |a Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation 
653 |a Intergenerational Income Distribution 
653 |a Human Capital 
653 |a Public Finance 
653 |a Revenue 
653 |a Employment 
710 2 |a International Monetary Fund 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b IMF  |a International Monetary Fund 
028 5 0 |a 10.5089/9781589067998.073 
856 4 0 |u https://elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781589067998/9781589067998.xml?cid=22471-com-dsp-marc  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 330 
520 |a This paper discusses that during 2000–2002, the Tribunal considered a number of issues of substantive law upon which it had not previously been called upon to rule. These included interpretation of a provision of the IMF’s Staff Retirement Plan that permits the IMF, pursuant to specified procedures, to give effect to orders for family support and division of marital property issued by domestic courts. Having the benefit of the extensive pleadings of all three parties, the Tribunal rendered a decision resolving the merits of the dispute. The Tribunal considered the evidence offered by the IMF in support of the differential in benefits between the two categories of staff and concluded that the distinction was rationally related to the purposes of the employment benefits at issue. Tribunal also grappled during 2000–2002 with the complexities of its relationship to other elements of the IMF’s dispute resolution system. The IMFAT addressed the question of the admissibility before the Tribunal of an Application following dismissal of the complaint as untimely by the IMF’s Grievance Committee