|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02733nmm a2200589 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002082675 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001222765 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
220928 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9798400205439
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Beck, Thorsten
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a What Explains Remittance Fees? Panel Evidence
|c Thorsten Beck, Mathilde Janfils, Kangni Kpodar
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2022
|
300 |
|
|
|a 37 pages
|
653 |
|
|
|a International finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population & demography
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economic & financial crises & disasters
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate arrangements
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demographic Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency; Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Balance of payments
|
653 |
|
|
|a Long-term Capital Movements
|
653 |
|
|
|a Informal sector; Economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a Plurilateral trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Economics of specific sectors
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population and demographics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency crises
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Demography
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital controls
|
653 |
|
|
|a Population
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Capital movements
|
653 |
|
|
|a Remittances
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Investment
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Janfils, Mathilde
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kpodar, Kangni
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Working Papers
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9798400205439.001
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2022/063/001.2022.issue-063-en.xml?cid=515957-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a This paper uses data across 365 corridors to document time and country variation in remittance fees and explore factors predicting variation in remittance fees. We document a general reduction in such fees over the past decade although the goal of fees below 3 percent has not been met yet in many corridors. We identify both cost- and risk-based constraints and market structure as barriers to lower remittance fees. Higher transaction costs as result of a more rural population in the sending country and lower scale are associated with higher remittance fees. However, lower risks due to the stability of fixed exchange rates and Internet rather than cash payment are associated with lower remittance fees. Finally, remittance corridors dominated by banks and few players are characterized by higher fees
|