|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02612nmm a2200481 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002078896 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001218986 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220928 ||| fra |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781513537214
|
| 130 |
0 |
|
|a Benin: Technical Assistance Report-Public Investment Management Assessment
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Benin
|b Technical Assistance Report-Public Investment Management Assessment
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2020
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 70 pages
|
| 651 |
|
4 |
|a Benin
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: Infrastructures
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital investments
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public investment spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget Systems
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget planning and preparation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Other Public Investment and Capital Stock
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budgeting
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditure
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public-private sector cooperation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Expenditures, Public
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budget
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Capital spending
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public investments
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a National Budget
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Budgeting & financial management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Public Finance
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|b Fiscal Affairs Dept
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a fra
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a IMF Staff Country Reports
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781513537214.002
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2020/028/002.2020.issue-028-fr.xml?cid=49270-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA) of Benin has brought to light an institutional framework of high quality but ineffective implementation. In accordance with the PIMA methodology applied in several countries, the mission focused on assessing the institutional strengths (such as the legal framework and organization) for each institution in the analytical framework, as well as its effective implementation. Benin was found to have a high-quality, relatively complete institutional framework. The country outperforms its peers in this regard, not only compared with the average for the countries of the subregion (the West African Economic and Monetary Union—WAEMU), but also the Sub-Saharan African countries that have already conducted a PIMA exercise (Figure 1). The effectiveness of the framework, however, is weak
|