|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02987nmm a2200625 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002077406 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001217496 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
220928 ||| eng |
020 |
|
|
|a 9781589068674
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a IMF Involvement in International Trade Policy Issues
|
260 |
|
|
|a Washington, D.C.
|b International Monetary Fund
|c 2009
|
300 |
|
|
|a 225 pages
|
651 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
653 |
|
|
|a Balance of trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Tariff
|
653 |
|
|
|a Finance
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labour
|
653 |
|
|
|a International Trade Organizations
|
653 |
|
|
|a Public finance & taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Industries: Financial Services
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial services
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade liberalization
|
653 |
|
|
|a Currency
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Factor Movement
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exports and Imports
|
653 |
|
|
|a International economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Commercial policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a International trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor Economics: General
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign Exchange Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Exchange rate policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Development Planning and Policy: Trade Policy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Macroeconomics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Financial services industry
|
653 |
|
|
|a Empirical Studies of Trade
|
653 |
|
|
|a Taxation
|
653 |
|
|
|a Trade in services
|
653 |
|
|
|a Income economics
|
653 |
|
|
|a Foreign exchange
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor economics
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a International Monetary Fund
|b Independent Evaluation Office
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b IMF
|a International Monetary Fund
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a Independent Evaluation Office Reports
|
028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.5089/9781589068674.017
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9781589068674/9781589068674.xml?cid=22984-com-dsp-marc
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
520 |
|
|
|a Trade policy occupies an unusual and at times problematic place in the work of the IMF. Though trade policies of IMF members have strong influences on macroeconomic stability, they are often seen as peripheral to the IMF’s core competency. This evaluation, which examines the IMF’s involvement in trade policy issues during 1996–2007, addresses five questions. What is the nature of the IMF’s mandate to cover trade policy? Did the IMF work effectively with other international organizations on trade policy issues? Did the Executive Board provide clear guidance to staff on the IMF’s role and approach to trade policy? How well did the IMF address trade policy issues through lending arrangements and surveillance? Was IMF advice effective? The evaluation finds that the IMF’s role in trade policy has evolved in some desirable and some less desirable ways and recommends how to use the limited resources the IMF can devote to trade policy to fill these gaps
|