|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02174nmm a2200313 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002073827 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001213917 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220928 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789264637559
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789264558762
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789264850118
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Innovation Skills and Leadership in Brazil's Public Sector
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Towards a Senior Civil Service System
|c Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Paris
|b OECD Publishing
|c 2019
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 100 p.
|c 21 x 28cm
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Contextualising leadership challenges in Brazil's federal administration -- Strengthening demand for a skilled leadership in Brazil's federal administration -- Leadership for a more productive public service -- Developing the supply of innovation leadership in Brazil's federal administration -- Executive Summary -- Key skills for innovative leaders in Brazil's federal administration -- Foreword
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Brazil
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Employment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Governance
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b OECD
|a OECD Books and Papers
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a OECD Public Governance Reviews
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1787/ef660e75-en
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|a oecd-ilibrary.org
|u https://doi.org/10.1787/ef660e75-en
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 320
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In Brazil, as in other countries, innovation in the public sector is a core leadership challenge. Reflection is required on who these leaders are, what they should be able to do, and how they should be selected and held accountable to achieve results. This study establishes a new assessment framework for senior civil service (SCS) systems, based on the 2019 OECD Recommendation on Public Service Leadership and Capability. Using this framework, the study assesses Brazil's current system and recommends specific actions to improve it. The report also contributes to a broader debate on public leadership competencies in public sector innovation, and the systems needed to appoint the most effective people and help them achieve results
|