|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02191nam a2200265 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002072213 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001212303 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220923 r ||| eng |
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a McDonagh, Marian S.
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Living systematic reviews
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b practical considerations for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center Program
|c investigators: Marian S. McDonagh, Roger Chou, Jesse Wagner, Azrah Y. Ahmed, Benjamin J. Morasco, Suchitra Iyer, Devan Kansagara
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Rockville, MD
|b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
|c 2022, March 2022
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 PDF file (vi, 9 pages)
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a United States
|b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Evidence-based Practice Centers Program (U.S.)
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Oregon Health & Science University
|b Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b NCBI
|a National Center for Biotechnology Information
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Research white paper
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Contract No. 75Q80120D00006
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK579074
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 610
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Living systematic reviews are a relatively new approach to keeping the evidence in systematic reviews current by frequent surveillance and updating. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Evidence-based Practice Center Program recently commissioned a systematic review of plant-based treatments for chronic pain management. This white paper describes the team's experience in implementing the protocol that was developed a priori, and reflects on the challenges faced and lessons learned in the process of developing and maintaining a living systematic review. Challenges related to scoping, conducting searches, selecting studies, abstracting data, assessing risk of bias, conducting meta-analysis, performing narrative synthesis, assessing strength of evidence, and generating conclusions are described, as well as potential approaches to addressing these challenges
|