|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02412nmm a2200337 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002071353 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001211443 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220922 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0262325640
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780262325646
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a Q172.5.E77
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Rapp, David
|e editor
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Processing inaccurate information
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences
|c edited by David N. Rapp and Jason L.G. Braasch
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Cambridge, Massachusetts
|b The MIT Press
|c 2014
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a x, 467 pages
|b illustrations
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Common fallacies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cognitive science
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Errors, Scientific
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a COGNITIVE SCIENCES/Psychology/Cognitive Psychology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a COGNITIVE SCIENCES/General
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Braasch, Jason L. G.
|e editor
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b MITArchiv
|a MIT Press eBook Archive
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.7551/mitpress/9737.001.0001
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780262027588
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0262027585
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9737.001.0001?locatt=mode:legacy
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 001
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a "Our lives revolve around the acquisition of information. Sometimes the information we acquire--from other people, from books, or from the media--is wrong. Studies show that people rely on such misinformation, sometimes even when they are aware that the information is inaccurate or invalid. And yet investigations of learning and knowledge acquisition largely ignore encounters with this sort of problematic material. This volume fills the gap, offering theoretical and empirical perspectives on the processing of misinformation and its consequences. The contributors, from cognitive science and education science, provide analyses that represent a variety of methodologies, theoretical orientations, and fields of expertise. The chapters describe the behavioral consequences of relying on misinformation and outline possible remediations; discuss the cognitive activities that underlie encounters with inaccuracies, investigating why reliance occurs so readily; present theoretical and philosophical considerations of the nature of inaccuracies; and offer formal, empirically driven frameworks that detail when and how inaccuracies will lead to comprehension difficulties"--MIT CogNet
|