Commento a «La bufera e altro» di Montale

Despite the indisputable richness of the Montalian bibliography, there still was no comment on a fundamental collection such as La bufera e altro, published, after a complex and protracted gestation, by Neri Pozza in 1956. The aim of this book is to fill that void, giving a first contribution to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Romolini, Marica
Format: eBook
Language:Italian
Published: Firenze Firenze University Press 2012
Series:Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
Online Access:
Collection: OAPEN - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01795nma a2200265 u 4500
001 EB002063626
003 EBX01000000000000001204737
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220825 ||| ita
020 |a 9788892735880 
020 |a 978-88-6655-136-2 
020 |a 9788866551362 
100 1 |a Romolini, Marica 
245 0 0 |a Commento a «La bufera e altro» di Montale  |h Elektronische Ressource 
260 |a Firenze  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2012 
300 |a 456 p. 
041 0 7 |a ita  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OAPEN  |a OAPEN 
490 0 |a Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze» 
500 |a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ 
028 5 0 |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-136-2 
856 4 2 |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55055  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/4540cc11-7255-4052-8e94-1afa87bea9d6/9788866551362.pdf  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
520 |a Despite the indisputable richness of the Montalian bibliography, there still was no comment on a fundamental collection such as La bufera e altro, published, after a complex and protracted gestation, by Neri Pozza in 1956. The aim of this book is to fill that void, giving a first contribution to the exegesis of one of Montale's densest - and most difficult - works, where the poet draws the conclusions of a long research to restart his own inexhaustible search for new languages and imagery. Between preliminary introductions (proper essays) and notes, she tries to take stock of the matter by comparing the various existing critical hypotheses and proposing - in a close hand-to-hand with the text, verse by verse, problematising rather than glossing over - an original interpretative line.