«L’altro, il dialogo, lo specchio che ci rifrange» Carteggio Anceschi-Macrí (1941-1994)

This volume brings together 474 letters that Luciano Anceschi and Oreste Macrí wrote each other for 50 years. The strong point of the deep (and maybe unexpected) friendship between the two critics – based on the shared and fierce activism, on the common outlook of an «uncompromising humanism» – is c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Collini, Dario
Format: eBook
Language:Italian
Published: Florence Firenze University Press 2020
Series:Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: OAPEN - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02135nma a2200349 u 4500
001 EB002063624
003 EBX01000000000000001204735
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220825 ||| ita
020 |a 9788855181204 
020 |a 978-88-5518-120-4 
020 |a 9788855181198 
020 |a 9788855181211 
100 1 |a Collini, Dario 
245 0 0 |a «L’altro, il dialogo, lo specchio che ci rifrange»  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b Carteggio Anceschi-Macrí (1941-1994) 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2020 
300 |a 402 p. 
653 |a correspondence 
653 |a Hermeticism 
653 |a neo-avantgarde 
653 |a epistolary 
653 |a letters 
653 |a poetry 
041 0 7 |a ita  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b OAPEN  |a OAPEN 
490 0 |a Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze» 
500 |a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
028 5 0 |a 10.36253/978-88-5518-120-4 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/6d6b57e7-fe73-4472-b4c7-fac4c2dd033b/9788855181204.pdf  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 4 2 |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55618  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication 
520 |a This volume brings together 474 letters that Luciano Anceschi and Oreste Macrí wrote each other for 50 years. The strong point of the deep (and maybe unexpected) friendship between the two critics – based on the shared and fierce activism, on the common outlook of an «uncompromising humanism» – is curiously a dialectical progression that almost always excludes the perspective of a total agreement. It is a dialogue that springs from differences, and that exhorts to think about them. After the Second World War, the protagonists of the correspondence started to relaxedly discuss about the present and future of the European cultural civilization, the meaning of a literature that seems to illustrate a permanent state of crisis, and the events that gave life to the literary debate until the threshold of the new millennium, between post-hermetic tendencies and new experimentalisms.