|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02050nma a2200385 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002061644 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001202755 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220825 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a oapen_626362
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783110319712
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Erk, Christian
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Health, Rights and Dignity
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Philosophical Reflections on an Alleged Human Right
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Berlin/Boston
|b De Gruyter
|c 2010
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a History of Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Ontology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Dignity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Moral rights
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Thomas Aquinas
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Human
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Philosophy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Deontological ethics
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b OAPEN
|a OAPEN
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.26530/oapen_626362
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/a1e07adf-e7e4-47c0-8281-26836d3cb56f/626362.pdf
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 856 |
4 |
2 |
|u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31658
|z OAPEN Library: description of the publication
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 900
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 140
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 170
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 100
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The idea that there is such a thing as a human right to health has become pervasive. It has not only been acknowledged by a variety of international law documents and thus entered the political realm but is also defended in academic circles. Yet, despite its prominence the human right to health remains something of a mystery - especially with respect to its philosophical underpinnings. Addressing this unfortunate and intellectually dangerous insufficiency, this book critically assesses the stipulation that health is a human right which - as international law holds - derives from the inherent dignity of the human person. Scrutinising the concepts underlying this stipulation (health, rights, dignity), it shall conclude that such right cannot be upheld from a philosophical perspective.
|