|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02074nma a2200409 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB002041986 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001185652 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
220822 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783839461419
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783837661415
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Schultermandl, Silvia
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Affective Worldmaking
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Narrative Counterpublics of Gender and Sexuality
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Bielefeld
|b transcript Verlag
|c 2022
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 electronic resource (238 p.)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Gender studies, gender groups / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Gender Studies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Affect
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Literary studies: general / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Literary Studies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Sexuality
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cultural Studies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Gender
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Narrative
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Aresin, Jana
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Pages Whybrew, Si Sophie
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Simic, Dijana
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b DOAB
|a Directory of Open Access Books
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Edition Medienwissenschaft
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1515/9783839461419
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/53942/1/9783839461419.pdf
|7 0
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 856 |
4 |
2 |
|u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/80805
|z DOAB: description of the publication
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a What makes up a public, what governs dominant discourses, and in which ways can counterpublics be created through narrative? This edited collection brings together essays on affect and narrative theory with a focus on the topics of gender and sexuality. It explores the power of narrative in literature, film, art, performance, and mass media, the construction of subjectivities of gender and sexuality, and the role of affect in times of crisis. By combining theoretical, literary, and analytical texts, the contributors offer methodological impulses and reflect on the possibilities and limitations of affect theory in cultural studies.
|