Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

Efforts to reform the U.S. campaign finance system typically focus on the corrupting influence of large contributions. Yet, as Raymond J. La Raja and Brian F. Schaffner argue, reforms aimed at cutting the flow of money into politics have unintentionally favored candidates with extreme ideological ag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: La Raja, Raymond
Other Authors: Schaffner, Brian
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Directory of Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02642nma a2200325 u 4500
001 EB002040379
003 EBX01000000000000001184045
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220822 ||| eng
020 |a ump.13855466.0001.001 
020 |a 9780472072996;9780472052998 
100 1 |a La Raja, Raymond 
245 0 0 |a Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail  |h Elektronische Ressource 
260 |a Ann Arbor  |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (209 p.) 
653 |a Political parties / bicssc 
653 |a Politics and government 
653 |a Elections & referenda / bicssc 
653 |a Politics & government / bicssc 
700 1 |a Schaffner, Brian 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b DOAB  |a Directory of Open Access Books 
500 |a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
028 5 0 |a 10.3998/ump.13855466.0001.001 
856 4 2 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33895  |z DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/24045/1/1006088.pdf  |7 0  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 320 
082 0 |a 700 
520 |a Efforts to reform the U.S. campaign finance system typically focus on the corrupting influence of large contributions. Yet, as Raymond J. La Raja and Brian F. Schaffner argue, reforms aimed at cutting the flow of money into politics have unintentionally favored candidates with extreme ideological agendas and, consequently, fostered political polarization. Drawing on data from 50 states and the U.S. Congress over 20 years, La Raja and Schaffner reveal that current rules allow wealthy ideological groups and donors to dominate the financing of political campaigns. In order to attract funding, candidates take uncompromising positions on key issues and, if elected, take their partisan views into the legislature. As a remedy, the authors propose that additional campaign money be channeled through party organizations-rather than directly to candidates-because these organizations tend to be less ideological than the activists who now provide the lion's share of money to political candidates. Shifting campaign finance to parties would ease polarization by reducing the influence of "purist" donors with their rigid policy stances. La Raja and Schaffner conclude the book with policy recommendations for campaign finance in the United States. They are among the few non-libertarians who argue that less regulation, particularly for political parties, may in fact improve the democratic process.