Big data and the welfare state how the information revolution threatens social solidarity

A core principle of the welfare state is that everyone pays taxes or contributions in exchange for universal insurance against social risks such as sickness, old age, unemployment, and plain bad luck. This solidarity principle assumes that everyone is a member of a single national insurance pool, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iversen, Torben, Rehm, Philipp Benjamin (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2022
Series:Cambridge studies in comparative politics
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Cambridge Books Online - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02112nmm a2200313 u 4500
001 EB002018461
003 EBX01000000000000001181359
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 220707 ||| eng
020 |a 9781009151405 
050 4 |a HD7091 
100 1 |a Iversen, Torben 
245 0 0 |a Big data and the welfare state  |b how the information revolution threatens social solidarity  |c Torben Iversen, Harvard University, Philipp Rehm, Ohio State University 
260 |a Cambridge  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2022 
300 |a xiii, 232 pages  |b digital 
653 |a Social security / Political aspects 
653 |a Big data / Social aspects 
653 |a Big data / Political aspects 
653 |a Risk / Sociological aspects 
653 |a Public welfare 
653 |a Welfare state 
700 1 |a Rehm, Philipp Benjamin  |e [author] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b CBO  |a Cambridge Books Online 
490 0 |a Cambridge studies in comparative politics 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009151405  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 368.4 
520 |a A core principle of the welfare state is that everyone pays taxes or contributions in exchange for universal insurance against social risks such as sickness, old age, unemployment, and plain bad luck. This solidarity principle assumes that everyone is a member of a single national insurance pool, and it is commonly explained by poor and asymmetric information, which undermines markets and creates the perception that we are all in the same boat. Living in the midst of an information revolution, this is no longer a satisfactory approach. This book explores, theoretically and empirically, the consequences of 'big data' for the politics of social protection. Torben Iversen and Philipp Rehm argue that more and better data polarize preferences over public insurance and often segment social insurance into smaller, more homogenous, and less redistributive pools, using cases studies of health and unemployment insurance and statistical analyses of life insurance, credit markets, and public opinion