Screening for hereditary hemochromatosis a focused evidence review
Using pre-established condition definitions and screening and diagnostic criteria, we abstracted all studies into evidence tables. We summarized study results for disease development in those identified through two strategies, initial genotypic and initial phenotypic (biochemical) screening followed...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Rockville (MD)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
2006, August 2006
|
| Series: | Evidence syntheses
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
| Summary: | Using pre-established condition definitions and screening and diagnostic criteria, we abstracted all studies into evidence tables. We summarized study results for disease development in those identified through two strategies, initial genotypic and initial phenotypic (biochemical) screening followed by genotypic screening. RESULTS: Disease expression or penetrance is less than 100% in C282Y homozygotes identified through some screening method, but data were insufficient to define a very precise estimate of penetrance. Although available data suggest that 38-50% of C282Y homozygotes develop iron overload and 10-25% develop some type of hemochromatosis-associated morbidity, current research represents very limited numbers of observations and research designs subject to bias. The incremental benefit of earlier therapeutic phlebotomy is logical but not well supported by the limited treatment evidence. OBJECTIVES: To assess evidence sufficiency or insufficiency for hereditary hemochromatosis screening relating to two main United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria: the burden of suffering and the potential effectiveness of a preventive intervention. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE(r), CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases from 1966 through February 2005. We supplemented literature searches with source materials from experts in the field and from examining the bibliographies of key reviews and included studies. REVIEW METHODS: In conjunction with USPSTF leads and AHRQ staff, we developed three key questions with supporting definitions to capture the sufficiency of critical evidence necessary to make a recommendation for hereditary hemochromatosis as a new USPSTF screening topic. CONCLUSIONS: Research addressing genetic screening for hereditary hemochromatosis remains very limited. Not enough is yet known to confidently project the impact or benefit from widespread genetic screening for hereditary hemochromatosis The critical evidence we reviewed to answer these questions focused on the development of disease in screen-identified C282Y homozygotes (penetrance), the incremental benefit of earlier therapeutic phlebotomy treatment, and whether there are high-risk groups for possible targeted genetic screening. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria specific to each key question (KQ), we reviewed 1886 abstracts for inclusion in all key questions and 133 full-text articles for inclusion in KQ1, 67 articles for KQ2, and 55 articles for KQ3. Using USPSTF methods, we critically appraised studies using quality criteria specific to their design. To augment criteria provided for non-randomized treatment effectiveness studies, we added methods from the Cochrane Collaboration. We listed studies excluded from analysis and rationales for their exclusion. Our review abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 18 articles meeting our criteria for KQ1, six studies for KQ2, and 10 studies for KQ3. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Title from HTML title screen |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource illustrations |