Screening for HIV infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adolescents and adults a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Two new RCTs conducted completely or partially in low-resource settings found initiation of ART in persons with CD4 counts greater than 500 cells/mm3 associated with lower risk of composite clinical outcomes (mortality, AIDS-defining events, or serious non-AIDS events) (relative risk [RR], 0.44 [95%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chou, Roger, Dana, Tracy (Author), Grusing, Sara (Author), Bougatsos, Christina (Author)
Corporate Authors: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Oregon Health & Science University Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services June 2019, 2019
Series:Evidence synthesis
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
Description
Summary:Two new RCTs conducted completely or partially in low-resource settings found initiation of ART in persons with CD4 counts greater than 500 cells/mm3 associated with lower risk of composite clinical outcomes (mortality, AIDS-defining events, or serious non-AIDS events) (relative risk [RR], 0.44 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31 to 0.63] and RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.95]); early initiation of ART was not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. A large observational study also found initiation of ART in persons in high-resource settings with CD4 counts greater than 500 cells/mm3 to be associated with reduced risk of mortality or AIDS events, although the magnitude of effect was smaller. New evidence regarding the association between abacavir use and increased risk of cardiovascular events was inconsistent, and certain antiretroviral regimens were associated with increased risk of long-term neuropsychiatric, renal, hepatic, and bone adverse events.
LIMITATIONS: Only English-language articles were included. Observational studies were included. Studies conducted in resource-poor settings were included, which might limit applicability to general screening in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: New evidence extends effectiveness of ART to asymptomatic persons with CD4 counts greater than 500 cells/mm3. Certain ART regimens may be associated with long-term cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, hepatic, renal, or bone harms, but early initiation of ART is not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Research is needed to inform optimal screening intervals
STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies on benefits and harms of screening versus no screening and on the yield of screening at different intervals; the effects of earlier versus later initiation of ART; and long-term (≥2 years) harms of ART. DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator abstracted data and a second investigator checked data abstraction for accuracy. Two investigators independently assessed study quality using methods developed by the USPSTF. DATA SYNTHESIS (RESULTS): We did not identify any studies on benefits or harms of HIV screening versus no screening, or on the yield of repeat versus one-time screening or of screening at different intervals.
BACKGROUND: A 2012 systematic review on HIV screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found strong evidence that antiretroviral therapy (ART) is associated with improved clinical outcomes in persons with CD4+ T helper cell (CD4) counts less than 500 cells/mm3 and substantially decreases risk of HIV transmission, with certain antiretroviral agents potentially associated with long-term cardiovascular harms. The USPSTF previously found HIV screening tests to be highly accurate. PURPOSE: To systematically update the 2012 USPSTF review on screening for HIV in adolescents and adults, focusing on research gaps identified in the prior review. DATA SOURCES: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and MEDLINE (2012 to June 2018) and manually reviewed reference lists, with surveillance through January 2019.
Physical Description:1 PDF file (vii, 121 pages) illustrations