|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03366nam a2200313 u 4500 |
001 |
EB002000633 |
003 |
EBX01000000000000001163534 |
005 |
00000000000000.0 |
007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
008 |
210907 r ||| eng |
100 |
1 |
|
|a Likis, Frances E.
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c prepared for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center ; investigators, Frances E. Likis ... [et al.]
|
260 |
|
|
|a [Rockville, Md.
|b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
|c 2012, 2012]
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 PDF file (1 v. (various pagings)
|b ill.)
|
505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references
|
653 |
|
|
|a Comparative Effectiveness Research
|
653 |
|
|
|a Nitrous Oxide / therapeutic use
|
653 |
|
|
|a Labor Pain / therapy
|
653 |
|
|
|a Treatment Outcome
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a United States
|b Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Effective Health Care Program (U.S.)
|
041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
989 |
|
|
|b NCBI
|a National Center for Biotechnology Information
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a Comparative effectiveness review
|
500 |
|
|
|a "Contract no. 290-2007-10065-I.". - "August 2012.". - At head of title: Effective Health Care Program
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK100802
|3 Volltext
|n NLM Bookshelf Books
|3 Volltext
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 610
|
520 |
|
|
|a OBJECTIVES: The Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center systematically reviewed evidence addressing the use of nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE(r), Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases for articles published in English. REVIEW METHODS: We excluded studies that did not address a Key Question, were not original research, or had fewer than 20 participants. We identified a total of 58 publications, representing 59 distinct study populations: 2 of good quality, 11 fair, and 46 poor. RESULTS: Inhalation of nitrous oxide provided less effective pain relief than epidural analgesia, but the quality of studies was predominately poor. The heterogeneous outcomes used to assess women's satisfaction with their birth experience and labor pain management made synthesis of studies difficult. The strength of evidence was insufficient to determine the effect of nitrous oxide on route of birth. Most maternal harms reported in the literature were unpleasant side effects that affect tolerability (e.g., nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness). Apgar scores in newborns whose mothers used nitrous oxide were similar to those of newborns whose mothers used other labor pain management methods or no analgesia. Evidence about occupational harms and exposure was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The literature addressing nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain has few studies of good or fair quality. Synthesis of effectiveness and satisfaction studies is challenging because of heterogeneous interventions, comparators, and outcome measures. Research assessing nitrous oxide is needed across all of the Key Questions addressed: effectiveness, women's satisfaction, route of birth, harms, and health system factors affecting use
|