Vacuum assisted wound closure therapy

1. The scientific documentation on vacuum assisted closure therapy offers some evidence that the method: 1.1. yields faster healing and a higher percentage of healed wounds in patients with split-thickness skin grafts for wounds that are not "surgically clean", in patients with inflammatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (Sweden), Sahlgrenska sjukhuset (Göteborg, Sweden) HTA-Centrum
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Stockholm, Sweden] Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment 2011, 2011
Series:SBU alert report
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02558nam a2200253 u 4500
001 EB002000613
003 EBX01000000000000001163514
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 210907 r ||| eng
245 0 0 |a Vacuum assisted wound closure therapy  |h Elektronische Ressource 
260 |a [Stockholm, Sweden]  |b Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment  |c 2011, 2011 
300 |a 1 PDF file (5 pages) 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
710 2 |a Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (Sweden) 
710 2 |a Sahlgrenska sjukhuset (Göteborg, Sweden)  |b HTA-Centrum 
740 0 2 |a Vakuumassisterad sårbehandling 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a SBU alert report 
500 |a "This report was produced in collaboration between SBU and the Regional HTA Centre of Region Västra Götaland"--Page 1. - "The complete report is available in Swedish"--Page 5 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK298993  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a 1. The scientific documentation on vacuum assisted closure therapy offers some evidence that the method: 1.1. yields faster healing and a higher percentage of healed wounds in patients with split-thickness skin grafts for wounds that are not "surgically clean", in patients with inflammation in the thoracic cavity (mediastinitis) following surgery where the sternum is divided (sternotomy), and in patients with diabetes where gangrene necessitates forefoot amputation. 1.2. leads to fewer infections and fewer wound complications in patients with orthopaedic trauma and open fractures. 1.3. leads to a shorter length of hospital stay for patients with split-thickness skin grafts for wounds that are not "surgically clean". 1.4. reduces mortality in post-sternotomy patients with mediastinitis. 2. The utility of the method is uncertain in many clinical situations. The review of the scientific documentation reveals a lack of well-executed studies involving patients with split-thickness skin grafts in otherwise "healthy" wounds, with open abdominal wounds, with a necrotising fasciitis, with severe deep infection in the tissues between the urethra and the rectum (Fournier gangrene), with an open wound after fasciotomy, or with a tissue defect following musculoskeletal tumour surgery. 3. Randomised, controlled trials of different well-defined wound types are urgently needed. There continues to be a lack of good-quality health economic assessments