|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
05614nma a2201273 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001966233 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001129135 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
210512 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a books978-3-03921-599-7
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783039215997
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9783039215980
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gaio, Ana
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Sustainable Cultural Management
|h Elektronische Ressource
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
|c 2019
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 electronic resource (304 p.)
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a behavioral and emotional participation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural institutions
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a effectiveness
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural offer
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a contemporary art market
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a evolution path
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a qualitative research methods
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a public participation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cognitive sociology
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Shigatse city
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a pro-environmental behavior
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a n/a
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainable consumption
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a culture-led regeneration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Urban sculpture planning system
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainable management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a heritage
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a CBBE
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural distance theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a management
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a abstract and concrete information
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainable management of culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a post-transformation areas
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Delphi method
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a ABC model
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a attractivity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a social media
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a culture consumer
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a marketing concept
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a crowdfunding
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a museums
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a grid-group cultural theory
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a management of culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a culture 1.0-3.0
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Ostrava
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cross-border market for cultural services
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainable urban sculpture development
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a environment
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Romania
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a foresight study
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural communities of practice
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Information technology industries / bicssc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a event
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a public art
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a creative-cultural industries
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a management by project
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a art galleries
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Katowice
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural offer diversity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural and creative industries
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural participation
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a 3C Sustainable System
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Cieszyn-?eský T?šín
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a China
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a consumer-based brand equity
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a EU cohesion policies
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a social project culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural policy
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a European Capital of Culture
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a factor analysis
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a old industrial areas
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural services
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a attitudes
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainability
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a patronage
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a film industry
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a philharmony
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a town divided by a border
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a cultural sustainability
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Liverpool
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a social media content exploration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a integration
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a sustainable development
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Rosewall, Ellen
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Wróblewski, ?ukasz
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b DOAB
|a Directory of Open Access Books
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a 10.3390/books978-3-03921-599-7
|
| 856 |
4 |
2 |
|u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/60329
|z DOAB: description of the publication
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfview/book/1876
|7 0
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 363
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 000
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 576
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 658
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 333
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 700
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 600
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 300
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 330
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The connections between culture and sustainability have been in the public agenda since the 20th century. However, whilst global sustainability programmes at international institutional levels are yet to recognise the role of culture in their sustainability policies, the bid (albeit failed) in the early 2000s to formally add "culture" to the trilogy of sustainability pillars (economic, social, and environmental) mobilised a new discourse for the reframing of cultural policy narrative, which in turn urged a reassessment of methods of cultural management reflecting the same concerns among the sector's grassroots. The idea of sustainability and culture working together and their envisioned role in future-proofing society and human development captured the imagination of cultural commentators, policy makers and practitioners alike, keen to fulfil these principles "out there"-in cultural organizations and events mega and small, in cities and regions, local and global. The papers in this Special Issue reflect this appeal. This publication covers a wide selection of issues related to sustainable cultural management, which means that it can be recommended to a varied audience. First of all, it can be recommended to managers experienced in cultural management, where success is measured more by the degree of mission accomplishment and the social benefits achieved rather than by profit. Another group comprises the employees of cultural organizations who want to improve their knowledge of sustainable cultural management. This Special Issue can also be recommended to artists, researchers, students, state and local government employees, founders and patrons of art, and all those who want to understand the importance of sustainable cultural management.
|