Património Urbanístico e Planeamento da Salvaguarda

Urban heritage took four hundred years to establish itself as a cultural asset to be safeguarded and evolved along an historicalsocial process, rooted in the idea that urban sets and monumental architecture are part of the same category of historical values. In the second half of the nineteenth cent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adelino Gonçalves
Format: eBook
Language:Portuguese
Published: Coimbra University Press 2018
Series:Olhares
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Directory of Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02159nma a2200265 u 4500
001 EB001962502
003 EBX01000000000000001125404
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 210512 ||| por
020 |a 978-989-26-1457-1 
020 |a 9789892614564 
100 1 |a Adelino Gonçalves 
245 0 0 |a Património Urbanístico e Planeamento da Salvaguarda  |h Elektronische Ressource 
260 |b Coimbra University Press  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (356 p.) 
653 |a Portuguese 
041 0 7 |a por  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b DOAB  |a Directory of Open Access Books 
490 0 |a Olhares 
500 |a Creative Commons (cc), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
024 8 |a 10.14195/978-989-26-1457-1 
856 4 2 |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/55817  |z DOAB: description of the publication 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1457-1  |7 0  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
520 |a Urban heritage took four hundred years to establish itself as a cultural asset to be safeguarded and evolved along an historicalsocial process, rooted in the idea that urban sets and monumental architecture are part of the same category of historical values. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the notion of heritage stretched up and reached an urban dimension, but its social and political understanding did not release itself from theories and practices of intervention and safeguard action established within the architectural dimension from which came from. Aiming to contain change, they continue to resist to accept that change it is part of the nature of cities and to integrate it into the very meaning of the urban dimension of heritage. After all, of what do we talk about when we talk about urban heritage? Arising from various stimuli, this question guided the texts gathered here. They were written with different disciplinary perspectives because the measure that differentiates the urban dimension of heritage and architectural dimension is not metric or geometric. It is ontological and can only be understood in an integrated manner. In development, of course.