Averting the AMR crisis what are the avenues for policy action for countries in Europe?
Countries will vary in their points of departure and contexts, and their policy responses will therefore differ. However, all these avenues are important and, while some countries may need to prioritize certain avenues initially, all countries should aim towards a comprehensive AMR NAP.7. Introducti...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copenhagen, Denmark
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe
[2019], 2019
|
| Series: | Policy brief
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
| Summary: | Countries will vary in their points of departure and contexts, and their policy responses will therefore differ. However, all these avenues are important and, while some countries may need to prioritize certain avenues initially, all countries should aim towards a comprehensive AMR NAP.7. Introduction of particular measures within some of these avenues may be obstructed by financial, regulatory and other barriers. However, a recent model developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has shown that many policies targeted to tackle AMR are highly cost-effective. Countries should work together to overcome these barriers by sharing their experiences and examples of good practice.8. While the development of a NAP is an important step in governing the efforts to fight AMR, pursuing their successful implementation remains the biggest challenge. Good governance of AMR policies is thus a key determinant for success and should be at the forefront of any efforts to address the AMR challenge 1. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has serious adverse effects on human, animal and environmental health, healthcare systems, agriculture and national economies. With growing AMR rates, these costs are projected to increase dramatically if no action is taken.2. International and national efforts to combat AMR have grown steadily over the last two decades and culminated in the adoption of the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in 2015, which asked for all countries to develop national action plans (NAPs) by 2017.3. However, what has been done so far does not match the recommended scale of actions, and progress with developing NAPs has been inconsistent. Countries have thus been under mounting political pressure either to develop their first AMR NAP or to revise their current plan in line with international guidance.4. Since the drivers of AMR are multifactorial, AMR NAPs should also be multifactorial, involving a broad range of sectors, including human, animal and environmental health sectors, and utilizing a 'One Health' approach.5. Drawing on guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), key avenues of action to consider in an effective AMR strategy include:1.1. Increasing awareness of AMR1.2. Strengthening surveillance and monitoring, and moving towards national 'One Health' surveillance systems1.3. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship in human health1.4. Strengthening infection prevention and control (IPC) in human health1.5. Strengthening IPC and reducing inappropriate antibiotic use in animals1.6. Limiting the exposure of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens to the environment1.7. Fostering R&D of new antimicrobial therapies, diagnostics and vaccines6. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | At head of title: Health systems and policy analysis |
| Physical Description: | 1 PDF file (34 pages) illustrations, portraits |