Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, Part 2: Health economic evaluation
We have performed a cost-utility analysis (CUA) of mechanical thrombectomy in addition to standard treatment with thrombolysis compared with thrombolysis alone, in acute large vessel ischemic stroke. Conclusion Our cost-utility analysis indicates that mechanical thrombectomy as additional treatment...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oslo
National Institute of Public Health, Division of Health Services
2016, November 2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
| Summary: | We have performed a cost-utility analysis (CUA) of mechanical thrombectomy in addition to standard treatment with thrombolysis compared with thrombolysis alone, in acute large vessel ischemic stroke. Conclusion Our cost-utility analysis indicates that mechanical thrombectomy as additional treatment for patients with ischaemic stroke with occlusion of the big blood vessels, is cost-effective compared with standard treatment alone |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | English summary excerpted from full report in Norwegian: Mekanisk trombektomi ved akutt hjerneinfarkt del 2. Helseøkonomisk evaluering. - Excerpt from report no. 2016-01 |
| Physical Description: | 1 PDF file (pages 6-9) |
| ISBN: | 9788280828033 |