Evaluating the taxonomic status of the Mexican gray wolf and the red wolf

Scientists strive to develop clear rules for naming and grouping living organisms. But taxonomy, the scientific study of biological classification and evolution, is often highly debated. Members of a species, the fundamental unit of taxonomy and evolution, share a common evolutionary history and a c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Assessing the Taxonomic Status of the Red Wolf and the Mexican Gray Wolf, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Board on Life Sciences, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC National Academies Press [2019], 2019
Series:A consensus study report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: National Center for Biotechnology Information - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02781nam a2200277 u 4500
001 EB001888719
003 EBX01000000000000001052080
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 200106 r ||| eng
020 |a 0309488249 
020 |a 9780309488242 
245 0 0 |a Evaluating the taxonomic status of the Mexican gray wolf and the red wolf  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c Committee on Assessing the Taxonomic Status of the Red Wolf and the Mexican Gray Wolf, Board on Life Sciences ; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies 
260 |a Washington, DC  |b National Academies Press  |c [2019], 2019 
300 |a 1 PDF file (xiv, 90 pages)  |b illustrations, maps, portraits 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references 
653 |a Wolves / classification 
710 2 |a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)  |b Committee on Assessing the Taxonomic Status of the Red Wolf and the Mexican Gray Wolf 
710 2 |a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)  |b Board on Life Sciences 
710 2 |a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.)  |b Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b NCBI  |a National Center for Biotechnology Information 
490 0 |a A consensus study report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542551  |3 Volltext  |n NLM Bookshelf Books  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610 
520 |a Scientists strive to develop clear rules for naming and grouping living organisms. But taxonomy, the scientific study of biological classification and evolution, is often highly debated. Members of a species, the fundamental unit of taxonomy and evolution, share a common evolutionary history and a common evolutionary path to the future. Yet, it can be difficult to determine whether the evolutionary history or future of a population is sufficiently distinct to designate it as a unique species. A species is not a fixed entity--the relationship among the members of the same species is only a snapshot of a moment in time. Different populations of the same species can be in different stages in the process of species formation or dissolution. In some cases hybridization and introgression can create enormous challenges in interpreting data on genetic distinctions between groups. Hybridization is far more common in the evolutionary history of many species than previously recognized. As a result, the precise taxonomic status of an organism may be highly debated. This is the current case with the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) and the red wolf (Canis rufus), and this report assesses the taxonomic status for each