The punisher's brain the evolution of judge and jury

Why do we punish, and why do we forgive? Are these learned behaviors, or is there something deeper going on? This book argues that there is indeed something deeper going on, and that our essential response to the killers, rapists, and other wrongdoers among us has been programmed into our brains by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hoffman, Morris B.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2014
Series:Cambridge studies in economics, cognition, and society
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Cambridge Books Online - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 01715nmm a2200265 u 4500
001 EB001886770
003 EBX01000000000000001050137
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 191206 ||| eng
020 |a 9781139811873 
050 4 |a GT6710 
100 1 |a Hoffman, Morris B. 
245 0 0 |a The punisher's brain  |b the evolution of judge and jury  |c Morris B. Hoffman 
260 |a Cambridge  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2014 
300 |a xi, 359 pages  |b digital 
653 |a Punishment / Social aspects 
653 |a Human evolution 
653 |a Social evolution 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b CBO  |a Cambridge Books Online 
490 0 |a Cambridge studies in economics, cognition, and society 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139811873  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 303.36 
520 |a Why do we punish, and why do we forgive? Are these learned behaviors, or is there something deeper going on? This book argues that there is indeed something deeper going on, and that our essential response to the killers, rapists, and other wrongdoers among us has been programmed into our brains by evolution. Using evidence and arguments from neuroscience and evolutionary psychology, Morris B. Hoffman traces the development of our innate drives to punish - and to forgive - throughout human history. He describes how, over time, these innate drives became codified into our present legal systems and how the responsibility and authority to punish and forgive was delegated to one person - the judge - or a subset of the group - the jury. Hoffman shows how these urges inform our most deeply held legal principles and how they might animate some legal reforms