|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02907nam a2200421 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB001843031 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000001007020 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
tu||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
180730 r ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|z 0833068601
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0833068601
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9780833068606
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780833068606
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a HD9502.A2
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Henry, Ryan
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Promoting international energy security, Volume 3: Sea-lanes to Asia
|h Elektronische Ressource
|c Ryan Henry, Christine Osowski, Peter Chalk, James T. Bartis
|
| 246 |
3 |
1 |
|a Sea-lanes to Asia
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Santa Monica
|b Rand Corporation
|c 2012©2012, 2012
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 61-68)
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a Introduction -- Threats to Sea-Lane Security -- Current Sea-Lane Security Capabilities and Mechanisms -- Alternative Approaches to Sea-Lane Security -- Hurdles to Overcome -- How to Put Something in Place: Pursuing a Modified Approach -- Conclusions -- Appendix: Additional Multinational Maritime Security Mechanisms in Asia
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Petroleum industry and trade
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / Trade & Tariffs
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Energy security
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Petroleum reserves
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Security, International
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Osowski, Christine
|e [author]
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Chalk, Peter
|e [author]
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Bartis, James T.
|e [author]
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b ZDB-39-JOA
|a JSTOR Open Access Books
|
| 024 |
8 |
|
|a RAND/TR-1144/3-AF
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 0833079786
|
| 776 |
|
|
|z 9780833079787
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt3fh0k9
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 333.79
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Despite their growing importance in transporting vital energy resources, Asia's sea-lanes are already under stress and vulnerable, not only to geopolitical concerns but also the threat of piracy. Although the U.S. Navy has traditionally guaranteed freedom of the seas in Asia, a growing mission set and shrinking force structure challenge this role. RAND explored two alternative approaches to sea-lane security: joint and multinational. A joint approach would involve not only the U.S. Navy but also the U.S. Air Force and other relevant elements of the U.S. government (such as the Coast Guard and Department of State). A multinational approach could enhance partner capacity and promote burden sharing; improve the effectiveness and efficiency of unilateral and bilateral efforts; and better accommodate the emergence of new powers in the region, improving regional stability through confidence building. While the direct benefits of greater Air Force engagement in improving energy sea-lane security would likely be marginal, the spillover benefits of joint operations with the Navy and multinational engagement could make greater Air Force involvement worthwhile
|