Lessons from U.S. allies in security cooperation with third countries the cases of Australia, France, and the United Kingdom

"Like the U.S. Air Force, many U.S. allies work with partner countries on security matters, sometimes even with the same partners, but on a smaller scale. But how, where, and why do these allies engage the same countries? Would working together in particular areas be worthwhile or viable and ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moroney, Jennifer D. P.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Santa Monica, CA RAND ©2011©2011, 2011
Series:RAND Corporation technical report series
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: JSTOR Open Access Books - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04111nam a2200457 u 4500
001 EB001842745
003 EBX01000000000000001006734
005 00000000000000.0
007 tu|||||||||||||||||||||
008 180730 r ||| eng
020 |z 0833052624 
020 |a 0833052624 
020 |z 9780833052629 
020 |a 9780833052629 
050 4 |a UA870 
100 1 |a Moroney, Jennifer D. P. 
245 0 0 |a Lessons from U.S. allies in security cooperation with third countries  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b the cases of Australia, France, and the United Kingdom  |c Jennifer D.P. Moroney [and others] 
246 3 1 |a Lessons from United States allies in security cooperation with third countries 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA  |b RAND  |c ©2011©2011, 2011 
300 |a xxiii, 129 pages  |b illustrations (digital, PDF file) 
505 0 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 121-129) 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Australia's approach to security cooperation -- France's approach to security cooperation -- The United Kingdom's approach to security cooperation -- Comparing the case studies -- Conclusions and recommendations -- Appendix A: Royal Australian Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix B: Brazilian Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix C: Chilean Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix D: Colombian Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix E: French Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix F: Indian Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix G: Israeli Air and Space Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix H: Japan Air Self-Defense Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix I: Pakistan Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix J: Republic of Korea Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix K: Singapore Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix L: South African Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix M: United Arab Emirates Air Force activities with foreign partners -- Appendix N: Royal Air force activities with foreign partners 
651 4 |a France / Military relations 
651 4 |a Australia / fast 
651 4 |a France / fast 
651 4 |a United States / fast 
651 4 |a Great Britain / fast 
651 4 |a United States / Military relations 
653 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science 
653 |a HISTORY / Military / Strategy 
653 |a HISTORY / Military / Other 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b ZDB-39-JOA  |a JSTOR Open Access Books 
490 0 |a RAND Corporation technical report series 
500 |a "Project Air Force.". - Title from PDF title screen (viewed October 9, 2011) 
773 0 |t Books at JSTOR: Open Access 
776 |z 9780833059116 
776 |z 0833059114 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/tr972af  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 355/.031 
520 |a "Like the U.S. Air Force, many U.S. allies work with partner countries on security matters, sometimes even with the same partners, but on a smaller scale. But how, where, and why do these allies engage the same countries? Would working together in particular areas be worthwhile or viable and can specific lessons be learned from their experiences, for example, in the areas of planning, resourcing and assessments? This report explores these questions by examining both the positive aspects and the challenges of the security cooperation approaches of three U.S. allies, Australia, France, and the United Kingdom. These three capable allies are experienced in working with civilian counterparts and benefit from higher-level departmental guidance. They generally do so with relatively small budgets, leading them to learn to economize, pool resources, and take advantage of joint and interagency planning. These strategies can inform current U.S. thinking on security cooperation. They also suggest venues for further collaboration between allies, particularly in the three key areas of staff talks, exercises, and training followed by exercises."--Publisher's website